Ray Bradbury makes me mad
Published June 20, 2004
Ray Bradbury is making me mad. He's pissy with Michael Moore for calling his movie Fahrenheit 9/11 — meaning to compare the Bush administration to the authoritarians of Bradbury's class novel Fahrenheit 451.
"He didn't ask my permission," Bradbury, 83, told The Associated Press on Friday. "That's not his novel, that's not his title, so he shouldn't have done it."
Does this cranky old dude think that he has the special right that no one should even be able to invoke even a sideways reference to his special precious contribution?
What, does Bradbury think he owns the word "fahrenheit"? Are we supposed to pay Bradbury a fee every time we buy a frickin' frozen pizza with cooking instructions printed on the back? "Set oven to 400 degrees fahrenheit." Ding! Another penny for Bradbury.
Whatever the merits of this particular argument that Moore is making, the basic comparison offered in the title is utterly legitimate, mainstream literary technique. The premise takes off from saying that the Bush administration is destroying our freedom like the firemen burning the books in the Bradbury novel.
Anyway, this really cheeses ME off with Bradbury, for it puts me in the position of having to defend Michael Moore, whom I loathe. How wrong do you have to be for Al Barger to be taking MICHAEL MOORE'S side against you? Yet, in this case, Michael Moore is 100% in the right.
Ouch! Stop it. I'm hurting me. For some reason, I have an uncontrollable urge to kick my own ass for uttering the phrase, "Michael Moore is 100% in the right."
Ouch! I said it again.
File this under "More reasons to be skeptical of copyright law."
- Ray Bradbury makes me mad
- Published: June 20, 2004
- Type:
- Section: Video
- Writer: Al Barger
- Al Barger's BC Writer page
- Al Barger's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Titles can't be copyrighted -- unless they contain a trademark.
The law sez:
"...Names, titles, and short phrases or expressions are not subject to copyright protection. Even if a name, title, or short phrase is novel or distinctive or if it lends itself to a play on words, it cannot be protected by copyright.
…
To be protected by copyright, a work must contain at least a certain minimum amount of authorship in the form of original literary, musical, pictorial, or graphic expression. Names, titles, and other short phrases do not meet these requirements."
You're right. Bradbury should feel flattered that Moore thought enough of his novel, that he would be inspired to title his own work after it.
Allusion is a sign of respect, thus for Bradbury to pitch a fit about this is a kick in the teeth to Moore.
Eeek! I can't believe that - I really respected Bradbury as a writer. How rude!
Senility seems to have kicked in early for Bradbury. Tsk, tsk.
First Rosa Parks, now Ray Bradbury. Hmmm. People of accompishment and Al Barger don't appear to mix. Envy, one suspects.
Bradbury is overreacting, but the main problem is not with him. It is that Right Wingers are converting his disagreement with Moore over not getting his nod for borrowing part of the title as an overall criticism of Moore, when it is isn't. This tempest in a teaspoon is completely overblown.
Moore should drop in on Bradbury and smooth his ruffled feathers. I suspect that is all the elderly humanist wants.
Bradbury made a stink about it because he clearly finds something disagreeable about Moore's work and politics. He's largely irrelevant as a writer now, so perhaps he also did it for some attention. If you've ever met him, he's an unusual guy. That's to be expected, though, at his age. I don't find his work that inspiring or humanist, but I'm not a real fan of sci-fi geek stuff.
Are people interested in hearing more from him about his politics and the disagreement with Moore? I forget why else anyone would be interested in him today.
"Senility seems to have kicked in early for Bradbury."
Early? He's like, what, 83?
"First Rosa Parks, now Ray Bradbury. Hmmm. People of accompishment and Al Barger don't appear to mix. Envy, one suspects."
WTF?
MD must be off the MAOIs again. Look out!
Go see the movie on Friday June 25 and tell the White House types they're being SCRUTINIZED.
Also, check out www.moveon.org for the trailer and lots of reviews of 9/11. They can link you to the list of theaters who have booked the film.
OOPS, sorry.
www.moveonpac.org
Does anyone have Bradbury's email or postal address? I'd like to personally tell him how disappointed I am in him. I think I have read everything Bradbury has written and loved it. But I can't over look what he is doing in regards to this unsavory inappropriate powerplay!
Rusty- You may be overreacting. Bradbury's just being a bit of a cranky old man. So far as I know, he hasn't actually tried to DO anything, like sue Moore or such.
email address:
fahrenheit_r_us@infringement.com
I'm an admirer of Ray Bradbury's writing. But I have to ask: given that he 'borrowed' the titles for three of his books from other writers ("Something Wicked This Way Comes" - Shakespeare; "I Sing the Body Electric!" - Whitman; "Golden Apples of the Sun" - Yeats), what is he going off about? Or is it, as some have theorized, simply a high-profile ploy to drum up publicity for the new film version of Fahrenheit 451?
Strange.
so bradbury thinks he invented the word fahrenheit? it existed before he used it, and you can't copyright a title and ray ripped off his title from the degree that burns paper. that's 3 reasons why bradbury is whiny crybaby jealous of moore. goto http://mystic_lonewolf.tripod.com for rock opera about moore and bush that's better than anything bradbury ever wrote
Trying to locate source of Ray Bradbury story title, Dark They Were and Golden Eyed.
Can't find it in Tennyson, but perhaps it is.
Michael Moore is an ass hole any way any way, Im not a fan of bush but Michael Moore makes democrats look like retards, so its realy no wonder Ray Bradbury got pissed I've read the book in my high school class and a lot of people confused the tittles, it's more than just that though. Bradbury tried to contact Moore who allegedly avoided him. So I'm sure that he's pissed off at that too. The tittles share two simmilaritys the word Fahrenheit and the fact that both tittles have numbers after them. I don't think that Moore broke any law, and I don't think the Author expected to be paid any money. I think hes mad be cause he doesn't want his book tittle confused with the tittle of some political stupidity.





I wonder if Bradbury sought permission from the descendents of Daniel Fahrenheit before using his name in that book title.