From The Bottom Up: From The Fender Bass To The Software Synthesizer

Written by Ed Driscoll
Published June 17, 2004
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

The simplest option is direct injection, and in a hard disc-based recording system, that can allow the most options later. Cakewalk's Sonar program has an EQ with a plug-in that simulates the EQ curve of a traditional recording studio direct box. It's possible to plug a Fender Bass straight through something as simple as a Soundblaster soundcard's Live Drive breakout box, or M-Audio's Omni I/O breakout box and get a fat, terrific tone using this method.

However, noted British session musician Huw Price, the author of Recording the Guitar and Bass, would argue that using a small, valve-powered bass amp such as the Ampeg Portaflex and miking it with an Neumann U-47 microphone produces the best result. In his book, Price stresses the importance of capturing the low-mid and upper-mid frequencies of the electric bass:

because most domestic hi-fi speakers are incapable of producing the lowest frequencies. If the listener can hear the upper harmonics of a low bass note, the ear can be fooled into believing that it can hear the fundamental. If upper harmonics are absent, the bass line might disappear on small speakers.
Jim Roberts says that recording a bass amp has its drawbacks, though:
Nine times out of ten, if you go into the studio, they'll ask you to plug-in direct to the board, just because that's easier for the engineer to control, rather than using an amp and to mic the amp, because bass amps make so much noise in the studio that they leak into all the other amps, and they cause problems.
Roberts believes that a combination of direct and an amp produces the best tone. "You take a really good studio amp (and for many, many years, a really good studio amp was the Ampeg B-15, a small tube amp, that has a nice round sound), you mic that, and you take it direct off the bass, and then you can combine the two."

Ultimately though, as Craig Anderton, long time musician and author says, "Frankly, to me the most important aspect of the bass involves the notes and rhythms. I don't agonize all that much over the timbre as long as it fits the song". And in terms of how people hear music, he's probably right.

Comping Down a Track

Paul McCartney once said that when recording during the Beatles' Sgt. Pepper era, he'd frequently put the bass on last. While the band was recording its basic tracks, he would either do a simple bass part, or play a different instrument, such as piano or guitar. But waiting until the track was near completion allowed him to compose the most appropriate bass part for the completed song.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
From The Bottom Up: From The Fender Bass To The Software Synthesizer
Published: June 17, 2004
Type:
Section: Music
Filed Under: Music: Recording
Writer: Ed Driscoll
Ed Driscoll's BC Writer page
Ed Driscoll's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Ed Driscoll
Music: Recording
All Music Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — June 17, 2004 @ 15:28PM — Johno [URL]

Speaking as a working bassist, your kung fu is the best. Thanks Ed, for a fantastic article and reverent homage to the Low End.

#2 — June 17, 2004 @ 18:23PM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

What a great article. I'd often wondered why so many women played bass in rock bands, and asked one who was replaced in a studio session by Will Lee, and she said it was because there were fewer strings than a guitar.

Drums and bass are the two sections most replaced by machines, but I think that really opens up the field for awesome players, since machines can't do awesome yet.

#3 — June 17, 2004 @ 19:49PM — Eric Olsen

Really exceptional Ed: informative, interesting, enduring. Thanks as always!

#4 — June 18, 2004 @ 00:11AM — Casper [URL]

Great post; very informative.

Just a small quibble, though. I'd point to Anthony Jackson for the revolution of creating the contrabass (5 strings and more).

#5 — June 18, 2004 @ 00:22AM — Ed Driscoll [URL]

Casper,

That's a great point--Jackson is featured in both Jim Roberts' and Alan Slutsky's books, though. I also sort of kicked myself after writing this for not including Carol Kaye. But there are so many great players, it's tough to know when to stop.

Ed

#6 — June 18, 2004 @ 00:22AM — Ed Driscoll [URL]

Guys,

Thanks for the kind words--most appreciated!

Ed

#7 — June 18, 2004 @ 01:47AM — SFC SKi

As a bass player whio really wishes he'd deployed with at least one guitar to play, this clumn made me really eager to get back home and rebuild my calussed fingers. I am going to be buying a few of those books as well, thanks for the tip!

You should have mentioned the advent of affordable acoustic guitar-bodied 4 strings. I have a Sonata acoustic, only $275. but full sounding with great action, with the portability that many of us long-envied acoustic guitarists for haiving at beach parties or just sittin out back woodshedding.

once again, great column!

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/16603)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments