<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Napster offers free portable player with 1 year service</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:25:57 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by RC</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/17/144109.php#comment-202863</link>
<description>Is napster still offfering this?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">202863@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:25:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dave</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/17/144109.php#comment-69810</link>
<description>Well, encouraged by your reply I figured I&#039;d take another look:  a search for &quot;bruford&quot; brings up no Bill Bruford, but plenty of Barbra Mandrell and Barbra Streisand selections from which to choose.  They have nothing by Anthony Phillips.
  
A search for &quot;rypdal&quot; brings up nothing by Terje Rypdal, but offers &quot;Nordics vs. Reptilians&quot;, so at least they&#039;re getting the country right this time.
A search for &quot;towner&quot; brings up no Ralph Towner.  Amazingly, a search for &quot;zappa&quot; brings up a few albums that appear at first glance to be complete or mostly complete albums, though only a few.  They carry Miles Davis&#039; &quot;Complete Jack Johnson&quot; but are missing 6 of the 42 tracks.  It&#039;s not as bad as it was the last time I looked at it.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">69810@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 22:34:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by TDavid</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/17/144109.php#comment-69695</link>
<description>In the beginning it was that way, Dave, but it has gotten better. You didn&#039;t mention any specific artists so not sure what type music you were searching for. Clearly some types of music their selection is not as good as others.

As I said in the piece, Rhapsody still has a superior selection, but only Napster allows local downloading and portable sharing (if you have the right device with Janus technology) without requiring subscribers to buy the tracks at 99 cents a piece. Rhapsody and iTunes don&#039;t allow that.

Also, Napster still has that annoying &quot;buy only&quot; option which I spoke in depth about in the original review last October.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">69695@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:32:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dave</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/17/144109.php#comment-69689</link>
<description>I&#039;ve looked at Napster a few times since they reappeared.  It took me several queries before I found anything I might possibly want, and even then I couldn&#039;t find all the tracks of the albums I was interested in.  It seems that their catalog might be targeting &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.killuglyradio.com/features/miscellaneous/hockey_in_the_winter.php&quot;&gt;Debbie&lt;/a&gt; the 14 year old girl.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">69689@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:24:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>