<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on The Duke Watches "Orgazmo"</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:25:58 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by TDavid</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/16/142549.php#comment-69690</link>
<description>I&#039;ve seen this movie discussed before but never braved it as a rental.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">69690@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:25:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/16/142549.php#comment-69637</link>
<description>I understand - he needs help AND needs to be vilified for not getting it. Just because someone is nuts doesn&#039;t mean they aren&#039;t dangerous.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">69637@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:30:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaron, Duke De Mondo</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/16/142549.php#comment-69599</link>
<description>Thanks fellas.
RJ, i just hope Roger Ebert sees fit to use that expression in his future reviewing malarky.
Jim, spot-on about the Kung Fu, although i haven&#039;t yet saw BASEketball, so i&#039;ll have to reserve judgement, by which i mean, wait till i do, in fact, see the film what goes by the name of BASEketball.
Eric, thanks, man! Nice words are always appreciated. As for Michael, i realise that right there is a pretty contentious topic, but i guess i just mean that for a show such as south park, it would have been easy to do what everyone else was doing, ie, go for cheap laughs and nothing else. It certainly had plenty of cheap laughs, but also looked on the matter sympathetically. Whilst it didn&#039;t excuse jackson, it saw that there was probably a mental illness at work there that caused him to act in what might seem like a malicious nature, but was probably genuinely innocent. He needs help, is what it seemed to say, not to be vilified.
Thanks as ever, folks.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">69599@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 22:28:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/16/142549.php#comment-69591</link>
<description>Oh, by the way, I&#039;m not sure understanding is what Michael Jackson needs - he may have received altogether too much understanding over the last 20 years or so. A person with less cash, power, and understanding over that time might have had to reconcile his internal world with the external one filled with actual real living people</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">69591@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 20:46:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/16/142549.php#comment-69588</link>
<description>the back-alleys and rusted dumpsters of popular culture have rarely had a more charismatic and empathetic explicator - thanks Duke, you make it all seem almost noble.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">69588@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 20:30:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RJ Elliott</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/16/142549.php#comment-69581</link>
<description>Good movie, great review. Two dicks up!   :-/</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">69581@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 19:30:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/16/142549.php#comment-69531</link>
<description>What you missed was that &quot;Orgazmo&quot; is primarily a kung-fu movie in structure and plot points. The stunt cocks and double-vaginal - double-anal action are just the set dressing.

And in addition to a kick ass soundtrack, it has one of the best superhero rallying cries after Ben (&quot;It&#039;s Clobberin&#039; Time!&quot;) Grimm :

&quot;Go In The Front, Come Out The Back and Fuck Their Shit Up!&quot;

Plus it Jesus Approved (tm), He gave it the thumbs up, right there near the end.

I think &quot;Orgazmo&quot; is a better movie than their tribute to Zucker-Abrams-Zucker &quot;Baseketball&quot;.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">69531@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 15:47:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>