Reagan's Liberal Legacy

Written by Walter Enderby
Published June 12, 2004

Joshua Green, in the Washington Monthly, details all the liberal things Reagan did as president, such as raising taxes on corporations while cutting taxes for the working poor, negotiating away nuclear arms, pushing for human rights in the Soviet Union and increasing the size of the federal government.

Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Reagan's Liberal Legacy
Published: June 12, 2004
Type:
Section: Culture
Writer: Walter Enderby
Walter Enderby's BC Writer page
Walter Enderby's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Walter Enderby
All Culture Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — June 12, 2004 @ 15:25PM — kuros

"History teaches that war begins when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap." "Ronald Reagan"

#2 — June 12, 2004 @ 16:43PM — Mac Diva [URL]

Right. That is why Grace paid no taxes. Any tax cuts for the poor were offset by other policies, such as reducing eligibility for subsidized school lunches. If one buys that Reagan pushed for human rights in the USSR, it is only fair to wonder why Reagan insisted on 'constructive engagement' with South Africa. 'Increasing the size of federal government' is not liberal per se. Try again, Howard.

#3 — June 12, 2004 @ 17:59PM — Howard Owens [URL]

Mac, you're not arguing with me, so take your "try again" and shove it. This is what J. Green wrote. Take your issue up with him.

The reason I brought this article to people's attention to counter act the tendency on both the left and the right to simplify Reagan's legacy. Both the left and the right want to either turn him into an icon or a demon. The man, as most people are, was far too complex to characterize with broad strokes.

But realizing that takes some nuanced think, so hoping some people might get it may be too much to ask.


#4 — June 13, 2004 @ 00:29AM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Liberals don't dislike Reagan so much for his policies as for his rhetoric.

They decry deficits, but they forget two things:

1 - Previous Democrats in the White House created deficits as well

2 - Democrats controlled the House of Representatives (where spending bills are originally crafted) throughout Reagan's entire two terms in office

Reagan governed fairly moderately in a lot of areas. But we remember his speeches more than his policies. And his rhetoric was clearly conservative. And that pisses off the Left.

#5 — June 13, 2004 @ 01:26AM — Howard Owens [URL]

RJ, are you saying liberals care more about style over substance? Perish the thought!

#6 — June 13, 2004 @ 01:40AM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Heh...

What I'm REALLY saying is that the nitty-gritty of federal spending bills are boring to most people. They don;t remember the fiscal policies of Presidents.

They DO remember their speeches. Because their speeches show what they stood for.

GW Bush will be remembered not for tax cuts, or budget deficits, or stem-cell research. He WILL be remembered for opposing terror in speeches. And invading two terrorist nations.

#7 — June 13, 2004 @ 05:32AM — bhw [URL]

GW Bush will be remembered not for tax cuts, or budget deficits, or stem-cell research. He WILL be remembered for opposing terror in speeches.

Teeee-rust me, GWB's speeches will stay in the memory banks a long time, but not because of their content.

#8 — October 19, 2006 @ 13:27PM — Hoosier

I think George W. Bush will be remembered for being the worst President this country has ever had & I hope ever will have!
But he probably will be remembered for his 'LIES'

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/16473)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments