Brigitte Bardot Fined In France

Written by RJ Elliott
Published June 11, 2004

Story here

PARIS - French actress-turned-animal rights activist Brigitte Bardot was convicted Thursday of inciting racial hatred and ordered to pay $6,000 - the fourth such fine for the former sex symbol since 1997.

[...]

In her book, she also attacks homosexuals as "fairground freaks," condemns the presence of women in government and denounces the "scandal of unemployment benefits."

Bardot's attacks on Muslims prompted anti-racism groups to launch legal proceedings against the former star, who turned her back on film after 46 films to concentrate on animal welfare.

Bardot, who in her 1960s heyday was the epitome of French feminine beauty, was fined $3,250 in January 1998 after being convicted of inciting racial hatred in comments about civilian massacres in Algeria.

Four months earlier, a court fined her for saying France was being overrun by sheep-slaughtering Muslims.

While I find her remarks distasteful, I'm more disgusted by the lack of free speech in France. Why should someone be fined for offering their opinions, no matter how silly or insulting?

Thank God for the First Amendment. (Without it, half the posters on BlogCritics would likely be in a "re-education camp" somewhere...)

France isn't the only Western country with restrictive speech laws. Canada and Germany (and I'm sure many others) define "unacceptable speech" as well.

Thankfully, I live in the US of A. I can say, write, or sing whatever I want (short of slander, libel, or defamation).

Screw those in other countries who peer down their noses at us for being "backwards" on certain issues (death penalty, health care, etc.). We ain't perfect, but at least we are truly free to say what we want, without having to worry about being dragged into a courtroom to defend our comments.

RJ Elliott is a graduate student studying Criminal Justice at the University Of Central Florida. His likes include nature, sports, and pierced blondes. He dislikes daytime television, left-wing dictators, and lead-tainted Chinese imports. He is ambivalent about Angelina Jolie.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Brigitte Bardot Fined In France
Published: June 11, 2004
Type:
Section: Politics
Filed Under: Culture: Media
Writer: RJ Elliott
RJ Elliott's BC Writer page
RJ Elliott's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by RJ Elliott
Culture: Media
All Politics Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — June 11, 2004 @ 10:28AM — Mark Saleski [URL]

yea...now if we could only get the FCC out of the way.

#2 — June 11, 2004 @ 14:03PM — Jeff [URL]

I like Alan Dershowitz as an example of defending free speech. He, a Jew and ardent supporter of Israel, has defended Nazis in their free speech rights.

#3 — June 11, 2004 @ 14:22PM — Eric Olsen

Absolutely no offense meant, but you can tell the non-Americans on Blogcritics as they are the ones who make claims of libel, slander, defamation and the like, while Americans pretty much assume anything goes - a very different mindset.

#4 — June 11, 2004 @ 14:36PM — Tim Hall [URL]

It is a different mindset, something which Americans equally fail to understand. Perhaps our squeamishness over racist bigotry parallels by your ridiculous nudity taboo? Which does the greatest damage to civilisation, Bardot's racist book or Janet Jackson's nipple?

Most Europeans think a system that doesn't give radio shows to vile bigots like Michael Savage is a feature, not a bug.

#5 — June 11, 2004 @ 14:49PM — JR

Which does the greatest damage to civilisation, Bardot's racist book or Janet Jackson's nipple?

I'd say they're tied at zero.

#6 — June 11, 2004 @ 16:48PM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

Maybe because France, Europe and North Africa have a history of not stopping at hate speech, but murdering of various ethnic groups? After all, under the Vichy government, French Jews were rounded up and sent to death camps, nevermind the Dreyfuss affair. She was fined, her book wasn't burned. She advocated hate against an identifiable group, and in a country which has a fascist party, there should be curbs on hate. Or do you approve of reviving lynchings in the States, and defending those who would advocate lynchings?

Or that France fought a longtime war in Algeria, which continues to be a model for what the USA is experiencing in Iraq.

This USAian bleating about "free-speech" is just a smoke screen for bullshit. If you advocate genocide, you should be held accountable.

I can't wait for RJ to justify Rwanda (which was coordinated by radio broadcasts) or hail Milosevic as a great nationalist leader.

#7 — June 11, 2004 @ 19:20PM — JR

If you advocate genocide, you should be held accountable.

Why not save some expense and prosecute only the people who commit genocide? Or would you rather play it safe and just exterminate everybody who even thinks about committing genocide?

#8 — June 11, 2004 @ 19:48PM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

Exsqueeze me, but the fucking racist bitch was fined. Like a parking ticket. Which means we disapprove of what you've done, and you have to pay the price.

For example, if you want to rag on about the "free" USA, how about you smoke a joint on Main street.

Try telling the State you were just excersizing your freedom of speech before they throw you into a pound-you-in-the-ass prison.

I don't know which is worse about you 'murricans, the noisy bluster or the hypocrisy.

#9 — June 11, 2004 @ 20:04PM — JR

The hypocrisy. The noisy bluster is transparent and doesn't put anybody in jail.

#10 — June 11, 2004 @ 20:19PM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

The hypocrisy. The noisy bluster is transparent and doesn't put anybody in jail.

Yah, but they insist on selling via ice cream trucks which dispense meth in trailer parks. So the bluster and hyposcrisy are rather like the two things which need to be mixed together to make deadly nerve-gas.

#11 — October 16, 2006 @ 21:05PM — Pearce [URL]

We ain't perfect, but at least we are truly free to say what we want, without having to worry about being dragged into a courtroom to defend our comments

You might think so, but Jello Biafra was dragged into court for his band the Dead Kennedys including a poster in their album Frankenchrist. 2 Live Crew were dragged into court over the lyrics to their songs. Lenny Bruce was repeatedly put on trial for the things he said. Then there was the Tropic of Cancer trial, the Naked Lunch trial... George Carlin was arrested over supposedly obscene things he said... The poem Howl by Allan Ginsberg was banned at one point... Do you want me to continue?

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/16441)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments