<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on China to Britney: Come Dressed</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:55:09 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by magnetek</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/05/222709.php#comment-358375</link>
<description>great work1</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">358375@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:55:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by CW Fisher</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/05/222709.php#comment-71227</link>
<description>Mike, you are not Britney Spears. You are the third Olsen twin. But thanks for the phone number. Is that area code 555?
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">71227@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 21:12:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by madyson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/05/222709.php#comment-71206</link>
<description>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 britney you are my role modle. 
my friends say i look and dance just like you.i live in missouri.          
my number is 258 5111 piease call me </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">71206@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:26:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by CW</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/05/222709.php#comment-67803</link>
<description>NO!!!!  Diva, what are you DOING???

You had it and you wrecked it. I wasn&#039;t correcting you!  Corrections onbly destroy an otherwise living language. This is why Ebonics is the ONLY creative force purposely pushing the envelope. If I could study Ebonics, I would, but that would wreck it. 

To call a nose a genital, is double funny because &quot;nose&quot; already sounds plural. 

Okay, not so funny, but please don&#039;t &quot;stand corrected.&quot; My god, woman, take your hair down. Lift your shirt up once in awhile. I am!

: )

Here. Here&#039;s some bad verse for you. I gave some to dirtgrain a minute ago. I&#039;m sharing today. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Diva no madonna she shanana holy jesu mas frijole que bendejo
y qua b her middle name&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">67803@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:01:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/05/222709.php#comment-67778</link>
<description>Well, Richard Nixon had only one nose.  But, considering the length of the organ, I will alter my designation.  From henceforth we will refer to Nixon&#039;s nose, and all other sexual parts of the body, in the plural.  Ergo, Did Richard Nixon show genitals other than his nose in China?
  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">67778@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:32:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by CW Fisher</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/05/222709.php#comment-67773</link>
<description>Dear Tigress, I hear you roar, but many of my best friends are Chinese including Chinese blog readers who live in China, and even they, with their limited understanding of English and tiny little breasts know not to waste too much time typing back at me because they realize I am uncorrectable. While your information on China is probably more accurate than mine, please understand that I&#039;m trying to be funny here. As my muse Ms. Mac-o-Ron-i Diva once pointed out to an angry Al Barger, &quot;Curt writes humor.&quot; Blogs don&#039;t come with laugh tracks (yet) but dirtgrain could fix that with a click. 

On a less serious note, I honestly believe there&#039;s a great danger in having too many serious writers in one place, all typing at the same time as if to prove some adage about monkeys. What addage? Pick one. How about: &lt;i&gt;Paul was to Beatle songs what the Monkees were to the Monkee songs&lt;/i&gt;?

You see? Not funny, not accurate, not clear, but maybe, just maybe, an almost imperceptible sniff might snaff from a nostril which could be construed as an lol, benefitted by doubt, perhaps, but what the heck, it&#039;s three letters. 

Make your humor writer feel good. Type LOL even if it&#039;s a LIE. I don&#039;t mind. 

As to the guy that called me a racist, LOL!!!

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">67773@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:07:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by CW</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/05/222709.php#comment-67766</link>
<description>Diva, I have never seen the word &quot;genital.&quot; Congratulations!!  Genital. &quot;Did Richard Nixon show a genital other than his nose in China?&quot;

Why is it always plural? I could see the reason in a man, maybe, sorta, but not a woman. Why plural?

It&#039;s possible you&#039;ve fallen on a way out of jail for the flasher, who can now say it is not illegal to expose a genital. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">67766@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:47:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Purple Tigress</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/05/222709.php#comment-67691</link>
<description>I could be wrong, but I think when you have a population problem the last thing you need to worry about is discovering about sex. I think they need to discover birth control or start exporting people to less populated areas. 

Historically, the Chinese did have a concubine system and engaged in white slavery trade all over Asia. In the 1930-40s Shanghai and, more recently, Hong Kong and Singapore, are hot spots for prostitution so I don&#039;t think promiscuity is anything new either.

Are there really statistical information on the average breast measurements of each race and nationality to go with penis size measurements? Gee, such things make me want to wear a chador.

As for piercings, they already do them in Hong Kong which is now part of Mainland China. At least navel piercings so I&#039;m guessing if you look long enough, you can probably find nipple piercing, too.

So not very funny. Not very well researched. And yes, if my friends are looking around, some Chinese can actually read English and may make it to this Web site.

Respect for the dress codes of other countries should be considered a good thing. It keeps people from seeming like the stereotypical ugly American.












</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">67691@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jun 2004 03:05:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/05/222709.php#comment-67669</link>
<description>(Scratching head.)  Did Richard Nixon show a genital other than his nose in China?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">67669@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 6 Jun 2004 21:36:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Shark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/05/222709.php#comment-67663</link>
<description>Fisher, this is a dangerous place to do satire.

And unlike *me, resist the impulse to explain yourself.


*racist AND stupid</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">67663@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 6 Jun 2004 21:01:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by brandon</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/05/222709.php#comment-67662</link>
<description>what a terribly racist post. especially the assumption that the chinese will never read this post.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">67662@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 6 Jun 2004 20:55:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>