<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Labels Look to Limit Burns</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 3 Jun 2004 07:15:58 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by bhw</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/02/213226.php#comment-67075</link>
<description>I don&#039;t want people to have to develop codes to break the copy limitation code. Isn&#039;t that game getting old? I want the copy limitation code to be legally defeated. Nobody should be able to limit the media to restrict me from managing my data -- whether it be music or not. I can understand how they don&#039;t want me giving away thousands of copies of their copyrighted work, but I should be able to duplicate it as many times as I want as long as I don&#039;t distribute it.

And that&#039;s to say nothing of the fact that it might be MY copyrighted work I want to make thousands of copies of and distribute or make cup holders of!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">67075@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jun 2004 07:15:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jadester</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/02/213226.php#comment-67069</link>
<description>i wouldn&#039;t worry, this is just heading the same way the software market has gone: company develops great new &quot;unbreakable&quot; copy protection, about a week later (maximum), some hot crack group releases a crack/some kind of workaround for it.  In fact, if anything, the speed with which cracks for new games/general cracks for general copy protection systems are released these days seems to be increasing.
It&#039;ll be the same if this music copy protection becomes general use.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">67069@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jun 2004 06:21:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/02/213226.php#comment-67033</link>
<description>this is just like that frontline show last week...there were people working for the industry who just did not get it.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">67033@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Jun 2004 23:50:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bhw</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/02/213226.php#comment-67012</link>
<description>Wait, they want to limit how many copies I can make of a once blank CD that I bought and copied something onto?

What if I&#039;m just making backups of my own files? I&#039;m going to have to pay for CDs that can only be copied a limited number of times?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">67012@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Jun 2004 21:57:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>