Paycheck (DVD)

Written by Scott Pepper
Published June 02, 2004

Few science fiction writers have had their work so successfully adapted for the big screen as Philip K. Dick. His short stories have attracted the talents of some of Hollywood's biggest directors (Ridley Scott, Paul Verhoeven, Steven Spielberg) and actors (Harrison Ford, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Tom Cruise), resulting in some of the best hard sci-fi films of the past twenty years. With Paycheck, John Woo delivers a fast-paced thriller that retains enough of Dick's original material to satisfy all but the most die-hard fans.

The Film

Ben Affleck plays Jennings, a computer whiz who makes a living by reverse engineering cutting-edge technologies for competing companies. In the opening sequence, he does the creators of a three-dimensional monitor one better by eliminating the need for a screen at all. Due to the proprietary nature of his work, the companies who employ him require that Jennings undergo selective memory erasure after completing each task. If a project takes him three weeks, that time is wiped from his mind as soon as the work is done.

Jennings doesn't miss the lost time. He'd just as soon not remember time spent hunched over computers in a cramped room. His life, or at least what he can remember of it, is made up only of the "highlights," time spent between jobs. But the prospect a big engagement, one so big that the money he'd make would be enough to retire on, gives Jennings pause. The man offering the job is his friend Rethrick (Aaron Eckhart), who happens to be the head of a large technology firm. But the job is expected to take three years, years that will be lost to Jennings once it is complete. Nonetheless, the prospect of a ninety million dollar paycheck is too much to pass up, and he accepts the job.

After the work is done, Jennings' problems begin. When he goes to collect his money, he finds that sometime during the past three years, he forfeited all his pay. Of course, since he can't remember anything from that time period, he can't remember why he would have done that. He also can't remember why he sent himself an envelope with twenty seemingly useless trinkets.

Getting his paycheck is the least of his worries, however. The FBI wants to know just what exactly Jennings was working on, and they're not entirely convinced he doesn't know. To make matters worse, Rethrick isn't taking any chances and sends his own men after Jennings as well. With the help of his assistant Shorty (Paul Giamatti) and the beautiful biologist Rachel (Uma Thurman), Jennings has to piece together the past three years of his life before they catch up with him.

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Paycheck (DVD)
Published: June 02, 2004
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Action, Video: Adventure, Video: SF, Video: Thriller
Writer: Scott Pepper
Scott Pepper's BC Writer page
Scott Pepper's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Scott Pepper
Video: Action
Video: Adventure
Video: SF
Video: Thriller
All Video Articles
Scott Pepper's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — June 2, 2004 @ 14:26PM — jadester [URL]

I'm gonna have to disagree. This is a poor film, sure there's lots of action, but it's unrealistic in an unintentional way, Affleck's acting is wooden at best, and to be honest the whole thing isn't even up to the standard of the average '80s action movie. There's most certainly better out there (if you want an example of a very good PKD book-to-film translation, check out the director's cut of Blade Runner. It includes good acting)

#2 — June 3, 2004 @ 01:57AM — RJ Elliott [URL]

I haven't yet seen this film, but I can tell you that Ben Affleck is one of the worst actors of our time. He makes Keanu Reeves look like a master thespian in comparison.

#3 — June 3, 2004 @ 06:52AM — Scott Pepper [URL]

Affleck was the bomb in Phantoms, yo.

#4 — June 4, 2004 @ 18:16PM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

If you count success by box office, well, yeah, but if you look at how well it treats the source material, then PKD has only been screwed over, since Hollywood took "Confessions of a Crap Artist" to heart -- well, if he wants to make crap, we'll give him crap.

I've been a long-time PKD fan, and aside from "Blade Runner", there has only been one good movie made from his work, though "Minority Opinion" comes in second.

I haven't seen "Paycheck" yet because I was sure it would be crap, because Hollywood just doesn't like PKD, they don't like his plots, they don't like his ideas, and they certainly don't want to spend money anything which says everything is a sham, and this is a cheat.

I dread the forthcoming release of "A Scanner Darkly".

#5 — June 4, 2004 @ 20:53PM — Smenkharon

Right on Jim! A Scanner Darkly is my favorite novel and I am appaled that Keanu Reeves is set to star in the movie adaptation. Comparing the two performances should be an accurate way to see who is worse between Keanu and Ben Affleck though!

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/16178)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments