<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on <i>Spider</i></title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2004 15:36:25 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Andrew</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/05/26/010913.php#comment-65812</link>
<description>And yes, it&#039;s quite a &quot;downer,&quot; though I was also left with a sense of awe at Cronenberg&#039;s direction. While I started watching his films for the grue, this one really shows how he can get under your skin and disturb you without necessarily going to the admittedly fun excesses of, say, &lt;i&gt;Scanners&lt;/i&gt;.

Find the proper mood, by all means, but as someone who holds Cronenberg in high esteem, I believe you&#039;ll find this quite a wonderful addition to his work.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">65812@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2004 15:36:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Andrew</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/05/26/010913.php#comment-65811</link>
<description>Thanks, folks. Hope you enjoy the film as much as I do, if &quot;enjoy&quot; is the right term to use. *grins*</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">65811@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2004 15:32:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaron, Duke De Mondo</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/05/26/010913.php#comment-65766</link>
<description>Andrew, great review. I myself have no excuse for not checking out Spider yet. I just never got round to it i guess. And i kinda think it might something of a severe downer, which is no judgement on how good it might be, but just a way of saying sometimes i need to be in the mood for such &quot;weighty&quot; fare. Cronenberg is one of my favourite directors, and yet not one that instantly comes to mind when someone asks me &quot;hey, the duke, how are the best folks what ever pointed the cameras?&quot; 
Good stuff, and an incentive to check out this flick what i might have been unwittingly avoiding.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">65766@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2004 11:10:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/05/26/010913.php#comment-65733</link>
<description>Thanks AAJT, very nice review and I, for one, am certainly intrigued.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">65733@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2004 08:19:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>