Blogcritics: Comments on Garfield movie: CGI cat + real dog = dumb

Comment by Vic

Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:20:59 EDT

Phillip, I have found that it is almost a mathematical certainty that the number of well-known actors in a comedy is inversely proportional to how funny it is. :-) Vic

Comment by Phillip Winn

Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:09:14 EDT

Vic (#4), consider Bowfinger. *Several* funny actors in an unfunny movie!

Comment by Raven

Tue, 8 Jun 2004 22:10:52 EDT

When are we going to learn that Studio execs arent artist, they are not writers, so why cant they keep there crappy movie ideas off the big screen.

Comment by Vic

Sat, 29 May 2004 11:23:28 EDT

I will reserve final judgement until I see it, but all signs point to schlock. It would not the first time a funny actor has been in an unfunny comedy. Vic

Comment by Rodney

Sat, 29 May 2004 07:58:53 EDT

OK, so it seems stupid. But the lineup is good with Bill Murray as the tubby tabby. This will not be Finding Nemo, but it could be Cats and Dogs. Is that so bad?

Comment by TDavid

Tue, 25 May 2004 14:42:44 EDT

I'll give a nod that this movie is going to suck. But then it could gather a surprise audience like the Scooby movies.

Comment by visualsimpiclity

Tue, 25 May 2004 14:35:34 EDT

Wow, I was thinking the same thing last night when I saw a commercial for it. Terrible idea. The idea as a whole seems to not work either. I just don't see Garfield in anyway possible to be a live action movie.