<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Playing Ball with Graydon Carter</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2004 17:16:20 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/05/14/144331.php#comment-64086</link>
<description>What? Hollywood has ethics? I&#039;m shocked and appalled!

Two points I would make about this; William Golden&#039;s observation that in Hollywood, nobody knows anything, and, what, if anything does getting placed in VF actually have to do with the real world.

Can you say Gretchen Moll, sure you could. Now name a movie she&#039;s been in. Or three people who were on the cover of the Hollywood issue two years ago. So some suckers got taken for cash, where&#039;s the scandal in that. They have more money than brains. It seems to be a case of media envy that they didn&#039;t get to fleece the marks themselves.

Besides, Graydon has already spent all the money in smoking fines.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">64086@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2004 17:16:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>