Movable Type 3 SHOULD Cost Money

Written by Ken Edwards
Published May 14, 2004

Movable Type 3 has been out for a day now. And a lot of people have had time to weigh in with their opinions. Six Apart has been beaten black and blue for this new pricing scheme. It irritates me how many people are crying fowl about this.

Six Apart is not the Evil Empire, they are not the RIAA, they aren't even Microsoft! They are a software developer who cares about customers, they even listen to their customers. This is more then can be said for most software developers.

Lets look at a few facts:

1. MT 3 has a free version that is unsupported (just like before)
2. TypePad offers unlimited blogs and authors (and you don't have to pay for hosting on top of that)
3. MT 3 is NOT a feature release, although does include improvements
4. Six Apart has drastically changed the licensing restrictions (that was the most gripped about problem with MT)

Did I mention it is free?

Six Apart is just like most other software developers. They are in the business of making money. So get off their back for charging for Movable Type!

I couldn't agree more with Timothy Appnel's "Movable Type 3.0 and Eating" article. He makes a few great points, and is worth reading. It would be nice to see more articles defending instead of defying Six Apart.

But why do people want code (i.e. MT) free of charge? Easy. They have absolutely no clue as to how much work it actually took to make that code usable, much less elegant.

I was one of the few who donated after I started using Movable Type on multiple sites. You did know you can donate right? It is referred to "donationware" for a reason (Don't say this too loud, but donating to a freeware or open source based project actually helps the project move forward, or maybe thats just how I think).

page 1 | 2
Ken Edwards is the Gaming Editor at Blogcritics, and calls Breaking Windows home. Ken works part time for Student Publications at BGSU as the Webmaster and System Administrator. He is also a freelance web developer.

Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Movable Type 3 SHOULD Cost Money
Published: May 14, 2004
Type:
Section: Sci/Tech
Filed Under: Sci/Tech: Software
Writer: Ken Edwards
Ken Edwards's BC Writer page
Ken Edwards's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Ken Edwards
Sci/Tech: Software
All Sci/Tech Articles
Ken Edwards's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — May 14, 2004 @ 05:33AM — Geodog [URL]

There are some other facts out there too. Your presentation is one-sided and doesn't answer the question, why the outrage? Is is just because people want something for nothing? Nope, nobody is on Six Apart's back for charging for MT.

Just read a little history and maybe you will start to understand.

#2 — May 14, 2004 @ 11:15AM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

It isn't that Six Apart are selling Moveable Type which is the problem, it is that Six Apart completely failed to communicate with their existing customers and potential customers.

They have not been effective in explaining what is the value the user gets for the new, restrictive license, The way it is presented, you are paying more for MT 3.0 and getting less.

They failed to manage expectations, failed to make a selling proposition, and now are going to have to scramble like crazy to fix this.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/15669)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments