Bush can't apologize himself, because Jebus told him that ain't grammatacular, and if Shrub don't present a better image for right wing fuck wits, all the chits from his daddy ain't gonna get him in heaven.

Never mind how he's gotta get his slut daughters into heaven, Jebus, that is a problem.

The way I see it is that we'll have Shrub in the Lake of Fire, meanwhile the missus is waving at him from heaven. She's in an eternal library. What she doesn't know is that she is in charge of the Noam Chomsky Memorial Library.

In an eternal library, how long before a book is overdue?

As Father Jack would say, "That would be an ecumenical question".

YEEE--HAWWWW!!!!

"...President Bush told the Arab world on Wednesday that Americans are appalled by the abuse and deaths of Iraqi prisoners at the hands of U.S. soldiers..."

Unfortunately, you left out the part of the story, which I quote below:

"After the televised speech, two hundred million Arabs turned to each other and said, "Did you hear how he mangled the English language?!"

Shark wrote:

"After the televised speech, two hundred million Arabs turned to each other and said, "Did you hear how he mangled the English language?!"

Funny! :-]

Just curious, ya'll: Does anyone else find it peculiar that the media is going into berserker-mode over some photos that show situations that are, if anything, tamer than what a typical fraternity pledge can expect to endure?

And yet this same media almost never goes into detail about the 400,000 or so mass-graves that have been found from Saddam-era Iraq?

Just wondering...

The media is always going to give more coverage to that which more directly affects us here at home. Not that it's right, just that it's the way it is.

Hey, RJ, there's a genocide going on right now in Sudan. What are you doing about it?

Or are you just an ass-hat?

You're right, BCB. Also, the media don't want to get into asking the leftovers from the Reagan Junta who are now working under the Bush Brothers Banana Republic difficult questions about their past alliances. For all their reputed leftist leanings, the media largely are loath to piss off the leaders of the Axis of Evil.

ND:

How in the hell was the Reagan administration a "junta"?

Or is "junta" just easier to type than "elected in a landslide, in both elections, in a democratic manner"?

Nah, just sounds fun.

Okay, fair enough. ;-]

How about coven? Yeah, fundamentalist coven, that's the ticket.

RJ, media rule #1:

"It isn't news unless there's a picture."

Given a choice between:

1) Photo of mass grave: expanse of desert with bulldozer in foreground.

2) Torture pic: christ figure in a black klan outfit testing out a new form of muscle stimulation made by Westinghouse.

Which would you choose?

(um... assuming you weren't the news editor at FOX)

Amazing how many of you decided to post childish jabs at President Bush than to comment on the article. Anyway, I agree whole-heartedly with the soldier quoted in the article: when news reached us in Baghdad about the abuse and, even worse, some tired-ass excuses about not knowing the rules of the Geneva Convention, I was enraged. These idiots have tarnished the honor of the U.S. Military, and Americans everywhere. And trying cop a plea of ignorance- COME ON! I think any numbskull with half a functioning brain would realize making people stand on a box, naked except for a sheet, blindfolded, and told they were wired with electrical cables was not kosher, in any way, shape or form.

[Admin: Comment from Roger Ely of Asheville, NC, deleted.]

no, Truth-Minister. I don't do it as a way of life. I don't put panties on my head, only a jockstrap and only when I go grocery shopping. Panties we reserve for formal occasions.

"This is ridiculous - Bush should unequivocally apologize himself, period. He should say exactly what our man Joe Roche said, that the soldiers themselves are pissed, that this makes their job that much harder and more dangerous, and he should apologize."

What is the hang up with meaningless apologies? If Bush didn't order it, didn't partake in it, didn't cover it up and allow it - what is there for HIM to apologize for? I can't apologize for something that somebody else did and have it mean anything, it's worthless unless the person responsible apologizes.

The only thing I want Bush to do is to order the investigation, see that these idiots are court marshalled and brought up on charges in the Military Code of Justice.

That to me is much more important than an apology from someone that didn't take part in it to begin with.

Hmmmm...apology does imply guilt. Wow, what an interesting observation, Debbie.I shall chew on that awhile.

My thing is this:

Considering how everything else has been fucked up thus far, as IF this is going to be handled correctly.

Whatever. Heads will roll, la-dee-da.

Actually, there has been a UMCJ case underway since late January.

Which seems to get lost in all of the grandstanding going on.

The only thing I want the Shrub to do is to go away. Far, far away. Any apology from him is meaningless anyway: It certainly won't bring back all those killed by his say-so.

What really pisses me off about this whole mess (let's not get into the mass murder and torture of prisoners in Afghanistan) is that it was engineered and carried out by mercenaries, sorry, "contractors", y'know, the guys who deal in death drywall and torture roofing, but US troops are taking the fall.

It gives the term "plausible deniability" a whole new perspective.

And Bush and his junta are not responsible, how?

At least we now know why the Bush junta refused to sign onto the International Criminal Court, not because they didn't trust it to fairly provide justice, but because they really intended to commit war crimes.

As Mark Slackmeyer said about another Prez:

"Guilty, Guilty, Guilty".

RJ, media rule #1:

"It isn't news unless there's a picture."

Very true, Shark. Good point.