<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Vinyl Archeology #6</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 7 May 2004 23:42:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Clif D</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/05/04/103508.php#comment-62927</link>
<description>The Pablo Cruise LP , on the rack it is right after Nitzinger and just before Poco ... well, right now it&#039;s on the turntable . That is a good LP ... 

&lt;i&gt;Worcester, MA (for non-New Englanders, that&#039;s pronounced &quot;wuss-ter&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

My uncle born and raised on the Mississippi Delta says &quot;hand me that Wooster Sauce &quot;  ... </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">62927@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 May 2004 23:42:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/05/04/103508.php#comment-62412</link>
<description>heh...that reminds me of a bit they used to play on wbcn way the heck back in the mid-80&#039;s: it was about how to &#039;boston&#039;.

they had this guy trying to read off a list:

&quot;wor-cess-ter&quot;, &quot;dor-chester-ter&quot;, &quot;gla-ches-ter&quot;....

oh, and you forgot Lowell (&quot;lowl&quot;) and Chelmsford (&quot;chemsfid&quot;)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">62412@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 May 2004 09:21:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Johno</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/05/04/103508.php#comment-62411</link>
<description>Currently the Noath Shoah, Home of, among others, &quot;Pee-biddy,&quot; (Peabody) &quot;Glawstuh,&quot; (Gloucester), &quot;Swampskit,&quot; (Swampscott) &quot;Danvizz,&quot; (Danvers) &quot;Bevily,&quot; (Beverly), &quot;Woo-bin&quot; (Woburn), and my favorite, &quot;Ruhveeeaaaaah!&quot; (Revere). What the hell is it with New England? Some people even insist on calling Northern Massachusetts &quot;New Hampshire&quot; and New York&#039;s northern suburbs and landfills &quot;Connecticut.&quot; Crazy!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">62411@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 May 2004 09:17:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/05/04/103508.php#comment-62207</link>
<description>could be &quot;whistah&quot;...depends where in mass yer from.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">62207@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 May 2004 12:55:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Johno</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/05/04/103508.php#comment-62201</link>
<description>Not to nitpick, but I thought it was &quot;Whistah.&quot; But Massachusetts also insists that &quot;Peabody&quot; is pronounced &quot;Peebiddy,&quot; so what the hell do I know?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">62201@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 May 2004 12:37:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/05/04/103508.php#comment-62104</link>
<description>good point.  ;-)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">62104@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 May 2004 14:38:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom Johnson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/05/04/103508.php#comment-62102</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;kerphloogy out near Worcester, MA (for non-New Englanders, that&#039;s pronounced &quot;wuss-ter&quot;),&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah, but how do non-New Englanders pronounce &quot;kerphloogy&quot;?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">62102@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 May 2004 14:35:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/05/04/103508.php#comment-62062</link>
<description>right next to Robert Palmer in my vinyl collection.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">62062@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 May 2004 11:41:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/05/04/103508.php#comment-62060</link>
<description>the band photo on the back cracks me up.

it&#039;s SO 70&#039;s...tight, flaired pants, the hair, etc.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">62060@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 May 2004 11:34:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/05/04/103508.php#comment-62059</link>
<description>It&#039;s good, classy, unpretentious pop-rock with some underlying soul. That&#039;s flipping Peter Allen&#039;s &quot;I Go to Rio,&quot; by the way. Ask Van Helsing about it. i actually like &lt;i&gt;A Place In the Sun&lt;/i&gt;, with the title track and &quot;Whatcha Gonna Do?&quot; better.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">62059@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 May 2004 11:28:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>