John Kerry Is a Douche Bag
Published April 24, 2004
I've decided to make myself scarce 'round here but I could not resist spreading this URL.
I just love that URL.
I'm also hawking bmezine for the few of you on here who might be interested in something beyond the conservative, oatmeal, bland dribble, that bores most passionate souls. It's a place that features tattooing, piercing and general body modifications. I support this site 100%.
If you're ever in Chicago and looking for a unique night out and aren't a gay-basher, or have issues with drag queens, may I suggest the wonderful Kit Kat Lounge. Good food, great martinis, and of course, all those lovely Divas to keep you entertained as you dine. Highly recommended!
And finally, am I the only one who sees the irony in the fact the the US and the UK want the UN to take on a larger role in Iraq after they basically told the UN to go fuck themselves? Even better, the reason why they are looking for this "out" is because the Americans have been seen to have lost legitimacy in the region and they feel that a quicker resolution will come about if the UN is more involved. If I were the UN, I'd tell the US to fuck off... but I'm a yank so that will only extend the period that I have to pay taxes on this occupation. Can't wait to see what is going to happen on the deadline. Who wants to place bets on civil war within the next 5-10 years? (Not here... in Iraq, silly... though, now that you mention it...)
Of course, we could just do what many Blogcritics on here would love- lets just kill every Arab and Muslim out there who opposes us. I mean, we're right and they're wrong. They should DIE!! Or at least shut the fuck up and drive my cab! Uppity s---------s! Life would be so much easier if we just killed them all.
This little kick in groin was brought to you by a tattooed, pierced, motorcycle riding, bi-lingual (by my own choice. Speaking only one language is dull), university educated, well traveled, technology savy, nice rack'd, chick, who also happens to be the the authority on Chicken Sex Terrorism. Take that however ya will.
Remember:
MONO CULTURE IS NO CULTURE AT ALL!
- John Kerry Is a Douche Bag
- Published: April 24, 2004
- Type:
- Section: Culture
- Writer: Ms. Tek
- Ms. Tek's BC Writer page
- Ms. Tek's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments on this articleComments
It's savvy, Ms. Educated, not savy. And spare us the nonsense, denizens of countries that exist because of U.S. power and resolve.
denizens of countries that exist because of U.S. power and resolve.
Yes, banana republics and puppet leaders of created lands are real countries.
Whatever. Enjoy your la-la land, buddy. This isn't the same old US. That died when the greedy fucks took over the government. If it makes you hard, enjoy your fantasy.
Aww. No more fun comments like how "the best thing in the world" would be if Israel (and every Jew in it) was wiped off the map. Too bad. I'll really miss that...
Actually, why don't you take a direct quote instead. Israel are the Israelis AND the original Arabs (Palestinians). Big difference between a psycho, killer, Israeli and a Jew.
Jews are actually nice, good people for the most part. Zionists are the same as Islamic Fanatics.
Well, I'll admit that clarifies things somewhat, though I disagree strongly with your assertion that Zionists are as bad as Islamic terrorists.
Still. You are advocating the slaughter of millions of Jews AND Arabs. Not a pretty thing.
So, if I advocated the nuking of Fallujah, I guess I'd be a dangerous sociopath, but still somewhat less murderous than you...
Hey, if folks on here can demand the death of the Palestinians and Muslims and Arabs, I say
KILL EVERYONE THERE.
Call me whatever you choose, Mr. Elliot. As if I care if you think I am murderous or not. The day I am here to impress people, I'll let you know and offer you a ring side seat.
Until then...
what the fuck ever.
REMEMBER- KILL ARABS GOOD
KILL ISRAELIS BAD.
Join Tek's Brigade! JUST KILL THEM ALL (AND DON'T FORGET THE PSYCHO CRUSADER CHRISTIANS!!! THEY MUST BE EXTERMINATED AS WELL).
Thank you, drive through.
Next time, spell my name right. It's even listed for you!
Tek,
You are the most angry and bitter person I've ever seen. You make Mac Diva look like Miss Congeniality. ~~
I think the U.N. should be disbanded. It's a worthless shithole of an organization.
Many people say we should have gotten approval from the U.N. to go to war in Iraq. The countries that had the biggest trouble with us going to war were France, Germany, and Russia. These same countries economically benefitted from oil contracts with Hussein. So don't go bitchin about the greedy fucks in this country.
Why don't you complain about the corruption and greed in the European countries you love so much better than the United States.
Tom,
~~
Why don't you take that cigar and walk over the the UN and blow it up if you don't like it so much? You also talk about how much you dislike liberals... Perhaps pull that "gun" that you always have in your pocket and shoot some.
And you say I am full of hate...
Well you know where you can blow that out of... once you take the time to remove your head from the implied orifice.
You CAN manage that, can't you?
Oh... and you might want to stop linking porn from your website. You wouldn't want anyone to get the wrong impression of you, would you?
Nevermind... I think the impression people get is right on the money.
You're order is ready, pull up and drive through.
NEXT!!
I think the U.N. should be disbanded. It's a worthless shithole of an organization.
ROFLMAO!!
Yeah... on who's authority, huh? You gonna go do that? Take away their land in the US and you think that will rid the world of them?
"...worthless shithole of an organization."
Well, I could say the same of the GOP or any group-think political organization, democrats included.
GROW UP!
Many people say we should have gotten approval from the U.N. to go to war in Iraq.
I haven't heard, or even heard of, anyone saying that.
I have heard many saying that the UN should have been used to build a real multinational coalition as George Bush (The Lower Father) did in 1991.
One advantage of that was that three times as many troops were used to push Saddam out of dinky little Kuwait as were used by George Bush (Junior) to invade big bad Iraq. A major benefit was that the US paid only 25% of the cost then, whereas now you and I are paying 100% of the $5 billion being spent every month.
Bad idea, poorly executed.
TEK: Who wants to place bets on civil war within the next 5-10 years?"
I'll put money on 5-10 MONTHS.
Wait until we 'invade' Fallujah next week.
Shit
Hit
Fan.
= BUSH'S BLUNDER
"You break it, you own it." --Colin ("Steppin-fetchit") Powell
Bad idea, poorly executed.
And now it seems both sides of the table are starting to agree on that much.
This cost the the US... A lot. Both financially and morally. As I said, save for the fact its coming out of my pocket, I'm dying to see what happens next.
It keeps getting uglier and uglier.
The truth is that no one needs the UN's approval to go to war. Esp if it is a war to defend one's own borders and way of life. However, when you are talking about invading a country just because you don't like it's leader, then you might want to talk to the rest of the world about that. Even more important, if you are dealing with a culture that is completely different than yours, you sure as hell better talk to some other people about it.
But no matter... the UN will be coming in soon... they may run again if they get shot at a lot as they did before. They don't want to walk into a full out war situation. At the moment, Iraq seems to be more willing to deal with the UN than the US. Now- will that stave off civil war there- I would say doubtful. Too many different people there- kurds, sunnis, Shiites- and an unresolved battle for supremacy or independence. Still, I would rather the UN go in and the money from the US go back to something useful... perhaps Education.
One can dream, can't they?
Oi, Shark....
I really don't want to think about our troops being stuck in the middle of a full out shit-storm.
We are outnumbered and out "caused" (meaning that most of the troops there I doubt feel they are on a divine or super moral mission. At least not the ones I know). If it does get to the point where everyone starts revolting, you better start REALLY watching US civilian targets in the the States. What an opportune time for Osama to really start up again. Troops being committed left and right to Iraq, Afghanistan gone to pot, Pakistan tenuous. Saudis with their cloaks and dagger. Sharon having to be reminded that an "oath is an oath".
Everyone is going to be out for themselves. This isn't WWII and we are not dealing with western values and western ideas. This is a new cast of characters and the things they will do and the lengths they will go to will damn everyone if not handled properly.
The real question is:
Is it already too late and are we just watching the hour glass about to go out.
That is what scares me the most of all.
Look, if the USA wants to act like the Soviet Union, stop whining about how it just doesn't seem to be working.
Just suck it up. Nobody likes a bully, and everybody hates a bully who whines about how crappy his life is.
How well did it work out for the Soviet Union. Somebody got sold a lemon, just shut up about it.
"Zionists are the same as Islamic Fanatics."
From where do you draw this conclusion?
Zionists ultimately want to create a Jewish home where Jews are safe from persecution.
Islamic Fanatics ultimately want to exterminate Jews.
He should have said SOME Zionists. Like the late Meir Kahane, who once used the term 'Final Solution' in regards to Palestinians, because Israelis need 'living space', a phrase that translates to the German 'lebensraum'. Two terms not normally associated with ecumenical and interracial tolerance.
Personally, I want to take both sides and, figuratively speaking, bang their heads together while doing a modified version of Sam Kinison's "You're living in A FUCKING DESERT!!!" routine.
"Many people say we should have gotten approval from the U.N. to go to war in Iraq."
I haven't heard, or even heard of, anyone saying that.
You haven't???
"...[T]hree times as many troops were used to push Saddam out of dinky little Kuwait as were used by George Bush (Junior) to invade big bad Iraq."
Lots of this is due to Clinton. Seriously. He slashed the military. He drastically cut the number of troops we had available. Less troops, less divisions, etc. He also tied us up in conflicts like in the Balkans.
Also, the International Community was more willing to help out in an effort to dislodge an Iraqi invasion of Kuwait (a threat to international oil supplies) than engage in regime-change in Iraq.
Kerry, if elected, will be unlikely to garner much more (if any) support from the UN or the International Community than Bush has.
Nick - understood. There are probably some Zionists that are fanatics and equally extremist to the Islamic fanatics. A fanatic is a fanatic, whether Jewish or Muslim.
I don't think Ms Tek is justified in comparing all Zionists to Islamic Fanatics, however.
Agreed. I've been guilty in the past of making those kind of blanket judgments, but after years of reading, and thinking, and life experiences, I've seen that very rarely is any situation a simple matter of either/or. The Muslim website that uses the algebraic equation [Star of David][greater than sign][swastika] disgusts me as much as the Jewish website that calls for driving the Palestinians into the sea, but I know better than to think that they speak for everyone in their respective groups.
RJ Elliott: Lots of this is due to Clinton.
Damn that Bill Clinton! It's his fault that George Bush Jr. chose to invade Iraq with too few troops. Is there any problem that man didn't cause?
Tek and Tom, argue, disagree, express yourselves as fully as you like, but please do not call each other names and insult each other on a personal level.
HP "...[T]hree times as many troops were used to push Saddam out of dinky little Kuwait as were used by George Bush (Junior) to invade big bad Iraq."
RJ: "Lots of this is due to Clinton."
Geez, I should have known. That damned Clinton ... what was I thinking?
Of course! Rumsfeld's theory of military force had little if anything to do with it, right?
Thanks for straightening me out. And give my regards to The Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Insititute.
And who can forgive Bill Clinton for breaking up the Beatles!
Oh Gosh, I forgot about that too...
And now that you have me thinking...
Didn't he also shoot J.R.?
;o)
I'm pretty sure Bill Clinton steals the socks out of our laundry.
So THAT's where my socks go.Thanks for
solving the mystery.
bill clinton is also the cause for your AM radio going all kerphloogy when you drive under a bridge.
bastard!
It has also been rumored,although not
confirmed,that he was responsible for the break up of "The Banana Splits".
Surely you jest!
I have it on good authority however that t'was not Rasputin that whispered in Alexandria's ear but it was...
BILL CLINTON
Cute.
So, since no one can actually dispute the FACT that Bill Clinton reduced the number of American troops available, I guess you are all agreeing with me. Thanks.
Perhaps if Clinton hadn't slashed the military, Rumsfeld would have had more troops to work with re:Iraq. Ya know?
Clinton flashed the military? No wonder we're having trouble recruiting.
TEK: "The real question is:
Is it already too late and are we just watching the hour glass about to go out.
That is what scares me the most of all."
Personal Anecdote Warning:
My lovely wife -- who is normally the rock of gibralter, the fairly conservative, calm, level-headed, optimistic Registered Nurse in our domicile -- was watching the news this morning; she sat silently watching the shit-flying in Fallujah, the irony of Dick (I had other priorities) Cheney criticizing Kerry's war record, and other 'have a nice day' reports from next door and around the world.
Finally, she hit the off button, turned to me and said:
"You know what I'm starting to think?"
"No dear, what?"
*"Jim Morrison was right: 'I'm gonna get my kicks before the whole shithouse goes up in flames."
(This philosophy brought to you by George "I'm a harbinger of Armageddon" Bush.)
*Yep. A grandma quoting Jim Morrison. (It's okay to either laugh or be jealous).
RJ Elliott: Perhaps if Clinton hadn't slashed the military, Rumsfeld would have had more troops to work with re:Iraq. Ya know?
What kind of idiots do you think you're talking to? Rumsfeld has been saying all along that he thinks there are enough troops in Iraq. The administration has insisted that if the military commanders requested more troops they would get them, that the commanders didn't request more troops, and that the commanders were under no political pressure not to request more troops. As far as this administration is concerned, there is no troop shortage.
So apparently you're blaming Bill Clinton for a problem that doesn't exist.
Oh well, what else is new?
Actually, the force reduction pre-dated Clinton with the drawdown going into high gear immediately following the first Gulf War. This was part of the peace dividend of brought on by the end of the Cold War.
Add your comment, speak your mind
(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/15068)
Hey, if you ever come to the home of peace, order, and good government, give me a call.
But do you think this is the best way to get the sheep into the herd?