Hunley burials ignore history

Written by Mac Diva
Published April 24, 2004
page 1 | 2

Other historians agree with Hine that history as spectacle often overwhelms history as a record of what happened in the past to create the present. An interesting example is the history page at the official Hunley website. It never mentions why the Civil War was fought.

Though you would never guess it from the six days of carrying on devoted to burying remains from a century and a half ago, the Hunley's one military feat was not important to the outcome of the Civil War. Charleston Harbor remained blockaded. Furthermore, the Hunley failed overall. Two of the submarines were built and both sank. Eventually, the inventor gave up and named a ship 'Hunley' instead.

Another feat carried out during the Civil War is much more interesting.

The most modern comprehensive history of South Carolina, by [Walter] Edgar, makes only a one-sentence passing reference to the Hunley and doesn't even include it in its giant index.However, Edgar does mention another Civil War exploit in Charleston Harbor — the daring 1862 hijacking of a Confederate ship by slave Robert Smalls. Taking a cargo of ammunition and escaping slaves, Smalls posed as a Confederate officer and brought his boat through Confederate lines to the Union blockade.

Monk's column paints a realistic portrayal of South Carolina before, during and after the Civil War. It also offers insight into the motivations of the neo-Confederate movement today. Particularly telling is a remark by a slaveowner, Edward Bryan: “Give us slavery or give us death.”

What's the art?

A pocket watch recovered from the Hunley.

Note: This entry also appeared at Silver Rights.

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Hunley burials ignore history
Published: April 24, 2004
Type:
Section: Politics
Writer: Mac Diva
Mac Diva's BC Writer page
Mac Diva's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Mac Diva
All Politics Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — May 9, 2006 @ 12:56PM — Ken Kinnett [URL]

Thanks to John Monk. The neo-Confederacy movement fails to consider where white folks would be in the socio-economic order had the South won. We'd be under the rule of the aristocracy, probably meeking out a living as tennant farmers if not slaves ourselves. All other nations in the world would have stopped the slave trade and made it impossible for the CSA to import more African Ameeicans. Don't they realize they are glorifying losers? Ken Kinnett, Flat Rock, NC May 8, 2006

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/15047)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments