Why Elect John Kerry?
Published April 20, 2004
Liberal Boston Globe columnist Derrick Z. Jackson warns that John Kerry and the DNC may be treading dangerous ground with the ever-popular Bush Bashing strategy:
The reality is there is a core on folks on the right who believe Bush is an appointed guardian of unilateral American might. There is a core of people on the left who believe Bush is still not their president. But if it was so obvious to Americans outside the elite east and the Bay Area that Bush was a scoundrel, then the polls should not be merely even - Kerry should be ahead by a landslide.While criticisms of the current administration's failures in regard to economic policy are both necessary and apt, Jackson rightly notes that Kerry and his team have yet to present a true alternative. To truly mobilize more centrist voters, the Dems will have to not only continue to point out the flaws in Bush's economic plan, but to truly devise one of their own.Further evidence of how the Kerry folks are relying heavily on the ABB (Anybody But Bush) game was the campaign's recent ''release'' of something called the ''Middle-Class Misery Index.'' By the time you get done reading it, you'd think we're in the second Great Depression.
The ''index'' smacked of the very elitism that sunk Al Gore against Bush in 2000. Even though it is a political statement, the Kerry people propped it up by using terms usually reserved for sober university studies such as ''Key Findings,'' and by calling itself a ''report'' and an ''analysis.''
Citing drops in family income, tax cuts, and the rising prices of health care, college tuition, and gasoline, Kerry says Bush has the ''Worst Record of Any President Ever.'' As Democrats are fond of saying, no president has watched so many jobs disappear (2.6 million) since Herbert Hoover. ''Today we are 7 million jobs short,'' the press release said.
The index had lots of numbers for what Bush has done wrong on jobs. But when the release says, ''John Kerry has a comprehensive agenda to restart job growth" there were no projections of how many jobs his plans would create.
Kerry complained that on Bush's watch, public university tuition, because of the fiscal crisis of the states, went up on average 13 percent. Kerry promises $50 billion of tax cuts for college. But there was nothing in this press release about how he would convince the colleges from raising the tuitions.
For on-the-fence Republicans such as myself, Bush's excessive spending, call for open borders, and Medicare reform represent an open betrayal of the party's core values. For many of us who voted Republican in 2000, this president has not turned out to be the man we thought he was. I would like nothing more than to cast my vote for a candidate other than George W. Bush this November.
However, for Kerry to present himself as a viable alternative to the incumbent, he must immediately begin to detail his plans for the country. Hatred of Bush will only go so far with Middle America, and not far at all with undecided conservatives. It is all too easy to merely criticize, and far more difficult to present a plan of one's own. Without clear direction, where is John Kerry going to lead us?
- Why Elect John Kerry?
- Published: April 20, 2004
- Type:
- Section: Politics
- Writer: Scott Pepper
- Scott Pepper's BC Writer page
- Scott Pepper's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
It doesn't matter, because if Kerry were to be far ahead in the polls before Election Day, the administration would simply cancel the elections and move the country to a modified form of military dictatorship. And almost all conservatives will go along with it.
It's all over for this country, as a democracy. The future for democracy lies overseas. It's finished here.
Even though I think you're kidding, it feels like that could happen. If the "president" can be put in power by the crooked supreme court and wage war on a country that that hasn't attacked us, why not? If Kerry doesn't present himself as a good alternative, I'm voting for Nader out of spite. Which might actually be the best vote to support this democracy.
I'm not kidding. And please don't vote for Nader. The last time people did that--and I was one of them--they helped throw the election to one of the most corrupt and anti-democratic regimes in U.S. history, a regime that may have effectively liquidated the Republic.
I would never vote for Nader. All the hippies who voted for him, thanks, you are idiots. I can talk all the shit I want but the bottom line is I'll do anything to get Kerry elected.
Actually you're right about democracy lying overseas. Spain took its country back from their war mongering administration. Those people really are the picture of a healthy democracy.
suggest put greater edge on his programs by substituting with proper emphasis ...."THIS IS WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO" rather than "we have a plan" this will free objectives from being remembered within one repetitive label and lends specificity of purpose to each objective. Have a three page essay on Bushadministration bulll headed "absolutism" by "connecting the dots" of publicly established questionable judgements (intelligence)traced from his quoted assertion that "GOD WANTS ME TO BE PRESIDENT" if advised where to send it where it might be seriously considered. thanks, glm
Hey mike, you crack me up. I'll bet just like Camerson Diaz you believe that a vote for Bush is a vote for legalizing rape, too.
McBrady, your comment was a glowing endorsement for the use of terrorism to influence an election.











I agree. If Kerry wants "on the fence" votes he'd better stop with the bush bashing and get down to some policy. I'm tired of the bashing. Most of us already want him out but if Kerry doesn't strike a chord with middle of the road america, he won't get the votes. People will just stay home like always. And I won't blame them.