Blogcritics: Comments on Sophie B's Small Claims

Comment by

Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:50:01 EDT

The CD sold was a promotional copy distributed to music industry people as an advance of the CD release. It's common practice. They go to radio stations, PR contacts, reviewers/publications, etc. They are very clearly stamped (all that I have seen), NOT FOR RESALE. Not only did he offer the original promotional copy for $300 or so. But he also copies of it and sold those for $12.00 each. This is unquestionably copyright infringement.

Comment by tracy_s

Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:47:03 EDT

I have been following this story very closely. The media didnt report all the facts....big surprise. The two cd's in question were burned copies. Sophie was initially willing to let the sale of the promo drop, but the guy burned a bunch of copies and sold them to her fans.

Comment by Jim Carruthers

Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:38:37 EDT

Labels are only a legal fiction. Who is distributing her shiny plastic discs? Those are the people responsible for making her album available. Those are the people who are liable for violation of her copyright. If she did the whole 'Damn (I Wish I Was Your)' distribution from her kitchen table, then it's her fault, but otherwise, I'm looking at you whoever the distributor is. And Amazon doesn't indicate who that is.

Comment by Eric Olsen

Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:55:35 EDT

She IS her record company.

Comment by Jim Carruthers

Wed, 14 Apr 2004 15:51:33 EDT

I'd like to see Sophie B. Hawkins' claims, because I don't think they're very small. Oh, wait, I had an Al Bundy moment. Shouldn't she be going after her record company for copyright infringement? After all, allowing copies of an unreleased recording to circulate is clearly infringement. Fiduciary responsibility and all that (yes, I'm making with the funny - record companies and responsible - hah!)

Comment by Eric Olsen

Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:24:11 EDT

I think the issue here is probably the price: $300 for an advance CD makes you sit up and take notice. I don't think there would have been much of an issue if the price had been similar to retail. I don't know what the exact state of promotional copy resale law is, but I do know no one much wants to press the issue because resale of promo copies is considered a tacit part of a lot of people's - including label employees - pay.

Comment by Mark Saleski

Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:19:53 EDT

i get lots of promo material, both stamped as tom says and also sorta-cutout. i've never sold any of it off (of course, i don't sell anything off!)

Comment by Tom Johnson

Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:14:46 EDT

I wonder if this was a promo that was stamped with the warning that it's not for sale and can be recalled by the record company at any time, or one of the more commonplace cut-through-the-spine or holepunched-UPC "promos"? I would guess the legality of his sale would depend on the answer to that.

Comment by Craig Lyndall

Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:59:09 EDT

Well, what is your take on it Eric? You receive advanced copies of things and I know you keep at least most of it if not all of it, but do you feel it would be wrong for you to sell a promo copy of something you received?