Saturday Night Live with Janet Jackson, 4-10-04

Written by Al Barger
Published April 12, 2004

Saturday Night Live was well above average this week, though host and musical guest Janet Jackson was really the least of it.

Let's start with Ms Jackson's better part. She can dance. Not only her, but her whole troop had some outstanding choreography. It was worth watching her musical performances to see them.

The problem there being that the core part of all this, the actual SONGS, were nothing. Geez, no wonder this stuff isn't going over at radio. Forget any Superbowl backlash, the songs have no melody or hooks to speak of.

As to being a player in the sketches, though, Janet was just awful. She couldn't remember the lines, she's giggling nervously in the middle of others. The parts she actually remembered sounded like they were being read off cards by someone who doesn't get what they are supposedly saying.

This seems odd. She's had something of an acting career. What's the problem? Idiot baseball players and such have given stronger performances. Everyone thinks Jessica Simpson is a moron, but she gave a much stronger performance than this.

Wait though- I started out saying this was an especially good episode. Take it then that pretty much everything else was superior.

They did get good mileage out of Janet in the opening sketch. Jackson's execution was mediocre, but the IDEA of Janet as Condoleeza Rice flashing a titty to distract the 9/11 commission was killer. Best I could make out, apparently Janet in fact flashed The Titty to the live audience before shouting out the classic "Live from New York" tagline. In this case, however, The Titty was highly pixilated for broadcast and thus safe for public consumption.

Interestingly, the network made a point of noting that they would be broadcasting live (on the East coast), with no tape delay- despite the recent unpleasantness. The last time they put the show on tape delay was with host Andrew Dice Clay something like 14 years ago.

They did a pretty fair Good Times parody. The nominal reason would be that Janet had a part in the actual series. Her character was only minor to the show in the first place, though, and the least point of interest here.

page 1 | 2
Unreformed hawkish Hoosier hillbilly and sometimes candidate Al Barger runs the still squeezin' down the psychodelic Kentucky moonshine at MoreThings.com, what with the paranoid religious visions and the Pentacostal music and visions of God and anarchy running amok and such. Somebody oughta call the cops to report his out of control freedom of conscience. Till they come to take him away somewhere where he can't hurt anyone else, you can check out his weekly column of NEW ALBUM RELEASES.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Saturday Night Live with Janet Jackson, 4-10-04
Published: April 12, 2004
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Books: Entertainment, Books: Nonfiction, Music: Pop, Video: Comedy, Video: Television
Writer: Al Barger
Al Barger's BC Writer page
Al Barger's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Al Barger
Books: Entertainment
Books: Nonfiction
Music: Pop
Video: Comedy
Video: Television
All Video Articles
Al Barger's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — April 12, 2004 @ 10:40AM — Chris [URL]

I didn't see all of last Saturday's SNL (I was dead tired and kept falling asleep), but I thought Janet did okay. She did a great Condoleeza impersonation and her performance as the Janet Jackson fan (Esclalante) waiting in line to get a concert ticket was funny. But the "reunion" stuff was hilarious, especially the Kattan/Morgan/Fallon/Sanz musical bit and the return of Brian Fellow (I'll never get sick of that routine).

I agree with your assessment of the Prince Show (which has been done at least once before). Fred Armisen is excellent -- one of the best current cast members. When will he be taken off the "featuring..." list in the opening credits? The guy's great!

#2 — April 12, 2004 @ 13:39PM — Eric Olsen

I agree it was a good show, although I was also fighting sleep much of the time. Armisen's Prince was outstanding, funny but also sympathetic to Prince's eccentricity: by now everyone knows it isn't an act, he's just that weird.

I disagree about Janet, though. I thought she did great job throughout, especially the extended opening as Rice. But I really disagree about the music: I thought it was great. I hadn't heard any of her new stuff before and it's almost arty in its rhythm-based minimalism. Not everyone and all styles function in a traditional "song" mode, and dismissing entire genres of music because they are structured like Cole Porter and Woody Guthrie seems something of a waste.

I thought the show was a total success for Janet on all levels and it was great to see Chris and Tracy again, and it was funny to see Simon Cowell finally get up there and do something musical himself, even if it was just shaking the maracas.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/14633)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments