<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Did You Forget Something?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 9 Apr 2004 09:30:59 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Mr. Real Estate on Did You Forget Something?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/04/09/085111.php#comment-57077</link>
<description>It is poor reporting, possibly because blogs are seen by some reporters to be competitors that could put newspapers out of business (picture a local version of Blogcritics, and it could very well happen). The St. Petersburg Times did some poor reporting not too long ago. A Times reporter scanned my real estate when searching for real estate information, then they did a huge real estate feature-story special section. I saw information from my blog used, but my blog wasn&#039;t cited as the source. I think newspapers, for the most part, just want people to believe blogs are a fad, even when they&#039;re clearly not. Because blogs do compete with newspapers for readership, news organizations don&#039;t always want to give them credit as sources, because it increases blogs&#039; credibility to their readers. They may find information for a story on a blog, then go out of their way to find another source to say the same thing, in order to avoid using the blog as a source.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">57077@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Apr 2004 09:30:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>