Politics: Iraqi militants kidnap foreigners
Published April 09, 2004
An influential Shiite Muslim leader, Sheik Fatih Kashif Ghitaa, said, "Iraqis already see the American occupation as a religious war." Ghitaa said Shiite and Sunni clerics have discussed issuing a fatwa, or religious edict, against missionaries.
The missionaries — a mix of professional proselytizers and novices with little or no preparation — are buoyed by President Bush's evangelical bent, his oft-repeated biblical references and his vision of freedom spreading out from a saved Iraq.
We wondered if welcoming naive and unprepared persons with a religious agenda that most in Muslim culture consider insulting to the occupied country is counterproductive. Though the current seizure of captives does not include any American missionaries, militants taking them as hostages may be inevitable. Doing so will send a more direct message to the United States — that even a country as strong as it is vulnerable in some ways.
The Japanese received a chilling threat from the hostage takers.
"We tell you that three of your children have fallen prisoner in our hands and we give you two options — withdraw your forces from our country and go home or we will burn them alive and feed them to the fighters," the group said.
"You have three days from the date of this tape's airing," it said in a statement, accusing Japan of betraying Iraqis by supporting the U.S.-led occupation.
Their response is mixed.
A Japanese government spokesman demanded their immediate release and said there were no plans to pull out troops. Foreign Minister Yoriko Kawaguchi urged Japanese civilians, including journalists, to leave Iraq immediately.
It will be interesting to see if the United States also curtails the presence of civilians in the war-torn country — before American hostages are taken or killed.
Note: This entry is part of a column Mac-a-ro-nies.
- Politics: Iraqi militants kidnap foreigners
- Published: April 09, 2004
- Type:
- Section: Politics
- Writer: Mac Diva
- Mac Diva's BC Writer page
- Mac Diva's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
I am not clear on this and would appreciate input from knowledgeable people who are. Can't the government stop civilians from traveling to a war zone for a reason such as evangelizing? It seems to me that doing so would preclude the fallout that will surely occur when some of those people are taken hostage or killed. Both the constitutionally protected right to free expression and right to travel are limited. So, I wonder why the protective measure of limiting travel to Iraq has not been taken.





First let me say that I absolutely abhor what some Iraqis are doing to civilians. It's just beyond words.
But my feeling about civilians who are in Iraq to evangelize [even if it's under the guise of "humanitarian aid"] is that I don't think our military should go out of its way to protect them. By that I mean that soldiers shouldn't endanger themselves to protect civilians there to try to convert Iraqis to their religion.
If you are a civilian and you go into Iraq for religious reasons or even just for a fat pay check, you shouldn't expect the US military to protect you. I'm not saying the civilians do expect protection, but I just don't want to hear about one US military casualty that results from protecting civilians.
Civilians should bring their own protection, but as we've seen, even retired commandos aren't safe there.