<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Wonderfalls falls off the sked</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 5 Apr 2004 16:29:43 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/04/04/171742.php#comment-56052</link>
<description>Speaking of &quot;The X-Files&quot;, how about the crapitude of the last three seasons?

Here were eps where I would have paid the nets not to air them, and they can&#039;t even give a really interesting series 13 &#039;sodes? Somebody at Fox must really hate Tim Minear.

Plus a great theme song by Andy Partridge.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">56052@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Apr 2004 16:29:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/04/04/171742.php#comment-56050</link>
<description>I once rooted for Fox, the network that brought us &lt;i&gt;The X-Files&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;The Simpsons&lt;/i&gt;. Now I&#039;ve quit watching &lt;i&gt;The Simpsons&lt;/i&gt; because I&#039;m so disgusted with them. Between &lt;i&gt;Firefly&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Wonderfalls&lt;/i&gt;, I feel robbed. 

How long did it take &lt;i&gt;THe X-Files&lt;/i&gt; to catch on, anyway? Bunch of losers!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">56050@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Apr 2004 16:19:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/04/04/171742.php#comment-56038</link>
<description>One thing I did today was email Global to pick up the series run and air it in Canada. The rationale is that it probably would count toward Canadian content (and Global has very little of that). Apparently the Canadian numbers were quite good for Global, which couldn&#039;t air it Thursday (they show &quot;The Apprentice&quot;).

Well, for the time being, that&#039;s one less hour of teevee I&#039;ll be watching.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">56038@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Apr 2004 15:55:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bill Sherman</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/04/04/171742.php#comment-56024</link>
<description>Just look at the continued numbers for reality programming, consider that Fox&#039;s newest addition to the genre is &lt;i&gt;The Swan&lt;/i&gt; and it&#039;s amazing that network execs are even &lt;i&gt;looking&lt;/i&gt; at written teledramas these days - let alone something as quirky and uncategorizable as &lt;i&gt;Wonderfalls&lt;/i&gt;.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">56024@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Apr 2004 14:58:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/04/04/171742.php#comment-55857</link>
<description>What would be really cool is if the people involved put the remaining &#039;sodes (they filmed 13) available via biittorrent. Since you can track up-and-downloaders this would give real numbers for the online audience. Oh, wait, they proably don&#039;t want facts to get in the way.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">55857@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Apr 2004 18:21:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom Johnson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/04/04/171742.php#comment-55855</link>
<description>Sign the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/wonderfalls&quot;&gt;petition&lt;/a&gt;.  Who knows if Fox cares . . . it seems mighty strange that Tru Calling has stuck around this long but Wonderfalls isn&#039;t even given its entire half-season run . . . </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">55855@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Apr 2004 18:15:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/04/04/171742.php#comment-55852</link>
<description>They moved it, and I&#039;m assuming since it was canceled, it didn&#039;t do any better. Fox used to be the network where shows did a little longer look but clearly not anymore.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">55852@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Apr 2004 18:13:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom Johnson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/04/04/171742.php#comment-55850</link>
<description>I&#039;ve got one word to sum up my feelings about this: damn.

So, what, three, maybe four episodes is enough to determine if a series sticks around or not?  What ever happened to giving shows some time to develop?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">55850@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Apr 2004 18:09:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>