<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Liz Phair</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 4 Apr 2004 20:39:44 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/04/02/004153.php#comment-55877</link>
<description>Exactly why I appreciate vintage Liz more than the commercial variety.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">55877@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Apr 2004 20:39:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by particleman</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/04/02/004153.php#comment-55836</link>
<description>i saw Liz at the Austin Music Festival and was not too keen on her set, though i have to admit i don&#039;t own any of her records or know many of her songs. maybe she had more energy and spunk in her early years, but she seemed like she was taking a walk in the park when i saw her. i would have mistaken her for any of the other 82 singer-songwriter types at the festival.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">55836@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Apr 2004 16:27:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>