The Laws of Twoness

Written by CW Fisher
Published April 01, 2004
page 1 | 2

There are other differences. Republican women have thick necks, Democratic women have thick ankles. There are exceptions and even the inverse can be true: Condi Rice has a pencil neck and you won't find a skinnier pair of legs than the ones under Ginsberg's robe. The neck/ankle equation will serve you well until it hits you it's completely false.

Clichés are cheap vessels but they can hold a lot of truth. The rich really do get richer and the poor get even poorer. The rich move up, the poor move down. This has always been true.

John Kerry divides rich from poor at $200,000. Broadly put, if you're under the mark you would be gradually settling into a declining state; whereas if you're above the line, you're presumed to be in a state of ascension. At the very bottom of the jar is the sludge from which I write and spit, write and spit.

The GOP, which stands for Grand Old Party, is actually still quite grand and still getting older all the time, but it's not much of a party these days — ever since Richard Clarke began popping reputations like Macy's balloons, the GOP has beheld the incredible shrinking candidate, now the size of a prize, and no gumball.

Instead of looking for differences, perhaps we should be looking at similarities. Republicans and Democrats share one thing in common: a hometown. We all live in one. We might not come from the same neighborhoods, but we're all neighbors, all Americans, all easy to recognize in foreign countries because we're either triple-sized or anorexic and stuck through with needles.

Now in this town there roils a great seething unease, for its leaders have been winged and are scrambled, lo, see them duck and cover (quack!). In these confusing times, as we townspeople watch an administration burst into one spectacular lie after another, then flip the channel and see American bodies dragged by angry Iraqi mobs, it might do us well to realize our true twoness, because the reality is we have one leg in the Middle East.

To me, this election is about what's hanging over the ocean. This election may require some to quietly switch parties in the privacy of a booth, a difficult act, but it can be done (I speak from experience). Even though most Democrats would rather commit adultery than switch parties, and vice versa, it can still be done.

The truth, once you've unscrambled all the reds and blues, is always purple.

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The Laws of Twoness
Published: April 01, 2004
Type:
Section: Culture
Writer: CW Fisher
CW Fisher's BC Writer page
CW Fisher's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by CW Fisher
All Culture Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — April 1, 2004 @ 21:53PM — Dirtgrain [URL]

To hell with dualism. Life is not binary. We always have more than two choices. For example, we can choose Nader. . . Okay, I'm wrong. We basically have two choices. All of our stances on various multi-faceted issues must be crammed into either Kerry or Bush.

The art of politics has become so abstract and ungrounded (actually, for all I know, it has always been this way). If a person is a Republican, it is because this person has been tricked into being one. The same goes for Democrats. Both parties are out to fool us, manipulate us and propagandize us. Image is everything.

Dualism gets us stuck in this limbo. So much for my post, "Chicken Little Conservatives and a Failure of Reverence."

Purple doesn't exist. It's a perceptual malfunction. Or is that beige?

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/14301)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments