<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on The Duke De Mondo On &quot;Dawn Of The Dead 2004&quot;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 7 Mar 2007 04:41:09 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Louis Baumgart on The Duke De Mondo On &quot;Dawn Of The Dead 2004&quot;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/04/01/125635.php#comment-554891</link>
<description>What can I say?  I saw the original originally in the theatres way back when. Several times. I had no life.  The first third was great, the second third was boring, it put half the audience to sleep, the third part, with the motorcyclists was just dumb, great make-up here though.  Saw it again, doesn&#039;t hold up.  This remake was fun, Romero ain&#039;t ghod, and nobody has crapped on his bible, get over it.  The remake is a better, more cohesive whole.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">554891@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Mar 2007 04:41:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>