Nanomatic for the people

Written by Howard Lovy
Published March 25, 2004
page 1 | 2

One thing we discovered in looking at the numbers, though, is that while the dollar amount went down in 2002, the numbers of deals stayed steady. So, venture capitalists, at least the smart ones who have been following nanotechnology for years, are not just blindly throwing their money at it. They've been researching, carefully investing and now, with the economy picking up and some of the technology ready for the investment phase, you're seeing this increase.

But the impression that VCs are falling all over themselves to get in on the nano action isn't really true.

Government money, though, is a totally different story — DARPA, NIST ATP, SBIR, the whole alphabet soup. It's really not the private sector that's boosting the industry right now. It's government spending. And that's a fairly normal phenomenon for an industry in its early phase. The government props it up, encourages it, gets R&D moving in the lab, helps it along into the startup phase, and then the Darwinian world of business kicks in.

Even there, though, startups can live to see another day primarily through government grants. And right now, the military is where the money is at. Shop your nanomaterial around and tell a VC that your superstrong, superlight nano-enhanced polymer would be useful for garage doors, and you might be shown the door. But go to DARPA and say it can help reinforce tank or aircraft or cockpit doors and can stop a speeding bullet, and you might have an easier time getting some dough.

The difference now, though, is that public relations people have taken over the business of nanotechnology, and so there's a perception that VCs just can't seem to stop blindly throwing their money at anything with the n-word as a prefix. That's what creates buzz and gets nano names in the news during evening drive times.

Related Post

Will radio kill the NanoBot star?

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Nanomatic for the people
Published: March 25, 2004
Type:
Section: Culture
Filed Under: Culture: Media
Writer: Howard Lovy
Howard Lovy's BC Writer page
Howard Lovy's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Howard Lovy
Culture: Media
All Culture Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 25, 2004 @ 08:30AM — Anita Campbell [URL]

Howard,

Very interesting piece. The Marketplace segment was great, too.

Yesterday I attended a tech forum in Cleveland during which one of the speakers mentioned Small Times, saying it was THE publication for the nanotech industry. He referred to a map in Small Times pointing out that the Great Lakes and Northeast of the U.S. (from Chicago to Boston) has the greatest concentration of nanotech businesses and employees in the U.S. Is the map online anywhere? I couldn't find it at the site.

-- Anita

#2 — March 25, 2004 @ 09:55AM — Howard Lovy [URL]

Thanks, Anita. We try our best. Credit for the regional rankings issue has to go to Small Times' features editor, Candace Stuart. The map isn't online. For that, you might need to subscribe to the magazine. (Operators are standing by: https://register.smalltimes.com/subscribe.cfm?)

I think we might offer reprints, too. Let me know if you're interested.

Howard

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/14054)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments