The truth that they fit in the print

Written by James Golden
Published March 23, 2004
page 1 | 2

The media has allowed, without appropriate challenge, the claim that President Bush distorted intelligence leading up to the Iraq War. This claim was properly addressed by Tim Russert on this Sunday's Meet the Press when he asked Senator Ted Kennedy (one of John Kerry's biggest supporters), "So the president and the Congress was acting on the same information, and now you're saying the president lied when, in fact, your colleague, Senator Kerry, voted for war, voted for the authorization and said on the floor of the Senate, "Saddam has weapons of mass destruction." To which Kennedy responded, "The fact is this administration distorted and misrepresented--weapons of mass destruction, Tim--does Syria have weapons of mass destruction? Yes. Does Iran have it? Yes. Did Libya have it? Yes. Does Egypt have it? Yes. Does North Korea have it, this nuclear weapons--yes. So we understand that they had some program. They misrepresent the immediacy. They made the point--when they talk about mushroom cloud, they talk about grave, they talk about the immediate threat, they were talking about an immediate threat." I'm not really sure what Kennedy was talking about, but thank you Mr. Russert.

CNN has pretty much stopped using the word terrorist in it's articles, opting instead for "militant" and only occasionally using the 'T' word if they are quoting someone who happens to use it. AP has followed suit. The New York Times has long been accused of copping a liberal, almost communist bias in their reporting. Freedom of the press is one of the fundamental principles of American society, but the purpose of a free press is to help get the truth out, not enable publishing company’s to promote their own agendas or sway Americans with misinformation.


James Golden is a political columnist for MBGZ.com

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The truth that they fit in the print
Published: March 23, 2004
Type:
Section: Politics
Filed Under: Culture: Media
Writer: James Golden
James Golden's BC Writer page
James Golden's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by James Golden
Culture: Media
All Politics Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 23, 2004 @ 23:08PM — RJ Elliott [URL]

"The New York Times has long been accused of copping a liberal, almost communist bias in their reporting."

Wow! And I thought I hated the NYT...

Look, they aren't a "communist" organization, though they are clearly slanted towards the Left.

Yes, the press has done its best to make Operation Iraqi Freedom seem like a disaster, but that's because the mainstream media hates Bush and Republicans and conservatives and "aggressive wars for oil and plunder" (or whatever the hell they think it was all about).

Point is: Who cares? Rational folks realize the press is biased, and irrational folks largely don't vote. The net gain/loss is moot.

#2 — March 23, 2004 @ 23:13PM — Anita Campbell [URL]

James, great points. I heard someone on the radio the other day put it succinctly. When referring to the exaggeratedly partisan media reports, he said "Americans may just decide to turn the channel."

-Anita

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/14013)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments