Al Qaeda Endorses Bush

Written by mike larkin
Published March 17, 2004

This time, I'm not kidding:


The statement said it supported President Bush in his reelection campaign, and would prefer him to win in November rather than the Democratic candidate John Kerry, as it was not possible to find a leader "more foolish than you (Bush), who deals with matters by force rather than with wisdom."

In comments addressed to Bush, the group said:

"Kerry will kill our nation while it sleeps because he and the Democrats have the cunning to embellish blasphemy and present it to the Arab and Muslim nation as civilization."

La dee dah.

Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Al Qaeda Endorses Bush
Published: March 17, 2004
Type:
Section: Politics
Writer: mike larkin
mike larkin's BC Writer page
mike larkin's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by mike larkin
All Politics Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 18, 2004 @ 07:50AM — Debbie

Mike,

I've got a bridge to sell ya, dirt cheap, only used on Sundays.....

#2 — March 19, 2004 @ 02:01AM — RJ Elliott [URL]

This is troublesome to me...

If the terrorists had endorsed Kerry, the Bush people would surely have used it in their campaign. Since they have endorsed Kerry instead, the media is silent due to the theory that reverse-psychology is in play.

Look, the terrorists want a "peace" candidate to win. They were successful in Spain. They want Blair and Howard and Bush to fall. Their comments "endorsing" Bush are to be taken as dark humor, at best.

Still...

I wonder if the media is truly still liberal. If they were, would they not play up this "endorsement" and make sure all Americans knew where the terrorists stood in November?

Terror stands to gain a victory in November should Bush fall. We all know this. But to dismiss this "endorsement" is to engage in politics, something the major new organizations claim they want to avoid.

This endorsement should be widely publisized. Let the people decide.

#3 — March 19, 2004 @ 02:03AM — RJ Elliott [URL]

If the terrorists had endorsed Kerry, the Bush people would surely have used it in their campaign. Since they have endorsed Kerry instead, the media is silent due to the theory that reverse-psychology is in play.
---
I mean, they endorsed Bush instead. Sorry for the confusion.

#4 — March 19, 2004 @ 10:42AM — Shark
#5 — March 19, 2004 @ 10:44AM — JR

Terror stands to gain a victory in November should Bush fall. We all know this.

Um, actually, some of us know that terror stands to gain a victory in November should Bush win, as no other president would fight terror so ineptly.

#6 — April 28, 2004 @ 15:04PM — Rob

I think that though al Qaeda may have taken some major blows during the Bush administration, they have probably grown stronger, rather than weaker. Now, they are quite possibly the most infamous terrorist organization in the world. The Administration's actions throughout the world give them more propaganda for their recruitment campaigns than anything they could have come up with for themselves.

The right endorsement for al Qaeda is the current Administration. Our actions increase the hatred against us and key people are ready to exploit that hate. In "Against All Enemies", Dick Clark claims the ultimate goal of al Qaeda is nothing short of the re-establishment of the Caliphate - one that supports a radical militant branch of Islam.

I'm freaking worried.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/13836)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments