"Tight, and Lax, Security"
Published March 13, 2004
That's the title of the featured Letter to the Editor in today's Washington Post. Disturbing. Here's the letter:
To the Editor:
I read with interest the March 9 front-page story, "Security Lax at Smallest U.S. Airports."
Two weeks ago, when returning from a ski trip, I flew out of tiny Gunnison-Crested Butte Regional Airport in Colorado on Mesa Airlines for a connection in Denver.
My olive-drab parachute bag was singled out for inspection, and four Transportation Security Administration inspectors surrounded me and the bag while a fifth started looking through my long underwear and sweatshirts.
After the officers had examined every item in the bag, I asked a question and one of the officers replied that the security device detected pentaerythritol tetranitrate — one of the strongest explosives used today.
I was momentarily puzzled, then recalled that the same bag had accompanied me to Kuwait during Desert Storm, to Bosnia and to numerous training exercises where, as a Marine Corps combat engineer officer, I had been exposed to and initiated explosives and landmines.
Three points to this story:
• The security technology employed at U.S. airports is sophisticated enough to detect molecular trace elements of explosives.
• This technology exists in small, regional airports.
• Four days earlier, the same bag flew unimpeded on a United Airlines flight out of Dulles International Airport, the origin of American Airlines Flight 77 on Sept. 11, 2001.
Steve Brewer
- "Tight, and Lax, Security"
- Published: March 13, 2004
- Type:
- Section: Culture
- Writer: bookofjoe
- bookofjoe's BC Writer page
- bookofjoe's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us




Hey Joe - you screwed up the front page with the repeating **************
Might want to fix that by editing that out or mixing in a line break :)
Note to Phillip: wordwrap()