<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on 2004 Rock Hall Inductions</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:38:21 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Bob A. Booey</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/03/12/164246.php#comment-199399</link>
<description>Any band named after a city is automatically horrible. Or any band with a city in its name, unless it&#039;s followed by the word &quot;Dolls.&quot;

Find me an example where that isn&#039;t true. The only half-decent bands I could think of that had a city in its name were the New York/Dresden Dolls, hence the exception.

That is all.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">199399@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:38:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bob A. Booey</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/03/12/164246.php#comment-199398</link>
<description>Will you marry me, HW Saxton Jr.?

It&#039;s legal now in Canada.

That is all.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">199398@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:36:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by George</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/03/12/164246.php#comment-199352</link>
<description>Chicago has been playing for 35 years, have sold 125 MILLION albums, and have put on (With EWF) the best shows of 2004 and again in 2005. I don&#039;t qualify as an old homo...and I don&#039;t have a dead pet...but they sure as hell belong in the HOF. There are plenty of lesser talents already in-no one can deny that. Not even Mr. Saxton.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">199352@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:06:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by HW Saxton Jr.</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/03/12/164246.php#comment-51000</link>
<description>&quot;How come The Moody Blues and Chicago
haven&#039;t been inducted yet?&quot; That&#039;s just
because they have not decided which of
the following categories is suited best
for them:&quot;Music For Old Homos That Have
No Taste In Music&quot; Or &quot;Best Music For
Pet Funerals&quot;. The jury&#039;s hung for now.
Try again in 2005. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">51000@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2004 20:15:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Joe</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/03/12/164246.php#comment-50998</link>
<description>How come the Moody Blues and Chicago haven&#039;t been inducted? The list of inductees is peppered with mediocre acts including the Rascals, The Lovin Spoonful, Jefferson Airplane, The Shirelles (you&#039;ve got to be kidding), Del Shannon, Dusty Springfield and the Mamas and Papas. Jackson Browne??? Hall of Fame??

While the Moodys and Chicago may not be &quot;cool&quot; but they sold a hell of a lot of records and continue entertaining folks throughout the world.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">50998@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:56:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>