<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Social Security: It&#039;s a Bush-made crisis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:44:23 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by John on Social Security: It&#039;s a Bush-made crisis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/03/09/122210.php#comment-505450</link>
<description>Tom is obviously an idiot.  You should care about it because the govt. steals 6.2% of you income for it each year.  Money you won&#039;t see when you retire.  Money you could be investing right now on your own.  What a fucking joke.  God Bless America!  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">505450@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:44:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Hal Pawluk on Social Security: It&#039;s a Bush-made crisis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/03/09/122210.php#comment-49913</link>
<description>Is there some  reason this particular topic seems to drive you berserk, Tom?
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">49913@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:13:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom on Social Security: It&#039;s a Bush-made crisis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/03/09/122210.php#comment-49908</link>
<description>Who gives a fuck about social security.  You should be putting money away yourself.  Why should the government take care of you.

This &quot;i&#039;m entitled to it&quot; philosophy has got to stop.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">49908@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:36:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Hal Pawluk on Social Security: It&#039;s a Bush-made crisis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/03/09/122210.php#comment-49849</link>
<description>The basic approach seems to be the &quot;starving the beast&quot; principle they first enunciated during the Reagan years:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The starve-the-beast doctrine
is now firmly within the conservative mainstream. George W. Bush himself
seemed to endorse the doctrine as the budget surplus
evaporated: in August 2001 he called the disappearing surplus &#039;&#039;incredibly
positive news&#039;&#039; because it would put Congress in a &#039;&#039;fiscal straitjacket.&#039;&#039;
&lt;em&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/3g8h6%0D&quot;&gt;The
Tax Cut Con&lt;/a&gt; 09/14/2003]&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">49849@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:07:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mike on Social Security: It&#039;s a Bush-made crisis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/03/09/122210.php#comment-49837</link>
<description>One interesting tidbit is that the only &quot;succesful&quot; privatization of Social Security occurred (under the direction of University of Chicago right wingers) in Chile. That is, under a military dictatorship.

The same principle applies here: the GOP is using the fiscal crisis caused by its military expansionism and tax cuts to force changes in Social Security that people would not otherwise accept.

It&#039;s time to admit that, in important respects, the same Bush administration that claims to be spreading democracy abroad is increasingly resembling a military dictatorship at home. That&#039;s not hyperbole. It&#039;s a simple fact.

It&#039;s also an open question whether terrorists or the GOP are the greater threat to America. Both are attacking the foundations of the republic, and our democracy.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">49837@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:22:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>