Irresponsibility vs. Indecency

Written by Eric Olsen
Published March 03, 2004

There is a lot of hoopla over FCC cracking down on indecency over the airwaves, Clear Channel dumping Howard Stern, firing Bubba the Love Sponge, and related matters of live TV delays in the wake of Janet Jackson's Super Bowl nipple flash.

But veteran radio observer Sean Ross takes a wider view of the situation:

    while broadcasters have now been compelled to address sexually explicit content--and are likely to overcompensate in that area--it is only one symptom of how the relationship between broadcasters and their community went badly awry in recent years.

    After nearly two decades in which broadcasters had determined that any on-air controversy that didn't compel your firing (and some that did) would only increase your legend, the "roadkill barbecue" backlash was the first time that GMs really had to consider that not all publicity might be good and not all public outrage might be survivable. Then Sept. 11 happened and suddenly broadcasters were needed to console their communities, not provoke them. But even that cataclysm only briefly kept broadcasters from upping the ante. The "sex in church" stunt that led to the firing of Opie & Anthony was just one of three radio stunts that week that led to somebody's arrest.

    .... firing Bubba three years later, taking Howard Stern off of Clear Channel stations, forcing air-talent to pay part of any FCC fines, or announcing a policy of "zero tolerance" might assuage Congress or the FCC (don't bet on it, though). But it doesn't make up for nearly two decades in which managers taught their talent that it was better to ask forgiveness than permission.

    Beyond that, neither "zero tolerance" nor the FCC's sudden attention to three year old indecency complaints gets at the truly disturbing development of the last decade: the adversarial relationship between a station and its community that so many stations and air talents decided to foster. Stunts were no longer effective unless somebody threw up or the morning sidekick was arrested for carrying a chainsaw in public. April Fools Day could come and go, and it was still OK to tell listeners that Britney Spears was dead, or in your station parking lot.

    page 1 | 2
Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Irresponsibility vs. Indecency
Published: March 03, 2004
Type:
Section: Politics
Filed Under: Culture: Media
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
Culture: Media
All Politics Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 3, 2004 @ 16:46PM — Craig Lyndall [URL]

The whole system is flawed. The FCC reacts to complaints. How is it that in a democracy, the small percentage of complainers get to rule the rest?

#2 — March 4, 2004 @ 17:07PM — Zulu Nation

I wanna see more tits on TV. Who can I write to address this problem.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/13362)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments