<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Rumsfeld vs Reality?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:03:30 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Shark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/26/113716.php#comment-47514</link>
<description>Ash, 

Yeah. Okay.

Rumsfeld has never been known to lie before. Might as well give him the benefit of the doubt.

Nevermind. 

My bad.


&lt;i&gt;&quot;Don&#039;t be pissin&#039; on my back and tellin&#039; me it&#039;s rainin&#039;&quot;&lt;/i&gt; ---Dirty Sharky

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47514@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:03:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ash</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/26/113716.php#comment-47482</link>
<description>Granted that you have two statements made by two different people that contradict each other.

However, why by default assume it is Rumsfeld that is wrong?

In truth, every day you can find contradictions like this, especially by taking quotes out of context, as you have done here.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47482@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:21:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>