Rumsfeld vs Reality?

Written by Shark
Published February 26, 2004

Either our government agencies aren't working from the same script, or a lot can happen in one day:

2/24/04 - Defense Intelligence Agency chief Adm. Jacoby: "Taliban attacks have reached their highest level since the collapse of the Taliban government.[They] are a serious threat, potentially eroding commitments to stability and progress in Afghanistan."

2/25/04 - Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld: "I'm not seeing any indication the Taliban pose any military threat to Afghanistan."


Would you buy a used country from this man?


"Low mileage!" ...left.

Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Rumsfeld vs Reality?
Published: February 26, 2004
Type:
Section: Culture
Writer: Shark
Shark's BC Writer page
Shark's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Shark
All Culture Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — February 26, 2004 @ 14:21PM — Ash

Granted that you have two statements made by two different people that contradict each other.

However, why by default assume it is Rumsfeld that is wrong?

In truth, every day you can find contradictions like this, especially by taking quotes out of context, as you have done here.

#2 — February 26, 2004 @ 16:03PM — Shark

Ash,

Yeah. Okay.

Rumsfeld has never been known to lie before. Might as well give him the benefit of the doubt.

Nevermind.

My bad.


"Don't be pissin' on my back and tellin' me it's rainin'" ---Dirty Sharky

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/13166)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments