<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on &lt;i&gt;The Best Awful&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:57:21 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Vita on &lt;i&gt;The Best Awful&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/26/001506.php#comment-489164</link>
<description>I haven&#039;t read the book, but I love this review! It almost makes me want to read the book for a sort of masochistic--thrill. Gosh. And you&#039;re right about bullocks/bollocks.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">489164@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:57:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Keilantra on &lt;i&gt;The Best Awful&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/26/001506.php#comment-98771</link>
<description>I completely disagree with this.  The Best Awful is wordy, yes, may have excessive punctuation, but if you look at it as a whole, that craftmanship of this novel is outstanding.  I have never been so touched by a novel in so many ways before. Perhaps it is because you mere mortals have never felt what Fisher so stunningly describes... oh so tongue in cheek!

It was some sort of echo for me</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">98771@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 23:46:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>