It's Me Again, Cutie
Published February 25, 2004
Dear President W(easel):
I know. I know. I am getting to be a bit of a pest with all these letters I am sending you. I really want to stop but you keep doing all these silly little things to get my ire going.
This time you are proposing an amendment to the Constitution to get marriage defined as an event for a man and woman only. That's super swell that you have priorities and want to leave your mark on our country...
...but first can you work on an amendment to define the discharging of firearms as something that happens only between a man and a deer?
The way I see it, being a heterosexual, I honestly don't have much of a worry about becoming involved in a gay marriage. I do however have this issue of worrying about a bullet randomly piercing my spleen or some other equally important organ. I think this amendment might be more effective in stopping people from "sticking things where they don't belong" then even your proposed one... call me silly that way.
With that worry of having a chance of being senselessly shot out of the way, I bet I can spend more time on your initial proposal and try to figure out what is wrong with gay marriage... or at least try to figure how it relates to you having your head so far up Jerry Falwell's ass.
Not even considering Nadar as an issue,
Bri
*Brian spouts crap like this all the time at www.brianlewandowski.com and in his books: "Slop and Swill from a Festering Mind" and "W - the Book."
- It's Me Again, Cutie
- Published: February 25, 2004
- Type:
- Section: Politics
- Writer: Brian Lewandowski
- Brian Lewandowski's BC Writer page
- Brian Lewandowski's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments on this articleComments
...but first can you work on an amendment to define the discharging of firearms as something that happens only between a man and a deer?
Great stuff. Thanks, Bri.
How 'bout an amendment that REALLY protects the 'sancity' of marriage?
Make DIVORCE illegal.
Add your comment, speak your mind
(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/13126)
Since discharging a firearm at a person is illegal everywhere, no amendment is necessary.
Or, would you prefer that the President take a nonsense position like Senator Kerry...that he is opposed to same sex marriages and supports the defense of marriage act, but attacks the president for the amendment. An act and opposition mean nothing if a court can just overturn it and require other states to recognize marriages that are illegal in those states. For example, right now, the San Francisco marriages are void and not recognized elsewhere, but one judge could override the political determination of California and other states and require them to recognize those marriages.