<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Dean is done</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 21:35:18 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by TDavid</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/133407.php#comment-45816</link>
<description>Is this a good time to play that Dean scream audio clip? YEAAAAHHHHH!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45816@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 21:35:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Michelle</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/133407.php#comment-45808</link>
<description>i guess it was the perfect time to quit if he still wants edwards to get a chance, while dean himself knew he&#039;d not win anymore. i could imagine most of dean voters will switch to edwards now during the next elections.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45808@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:43:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/133407.php#comment-45779</link>
<description>Shark, have to disagree on the media thing: Dean did whatever he did to himself. He really freaked people out. The media was just the messenger. I thought the media was generally positive toward Dean until he wigged.Read what Chris wrote above: that was the general response - it was the people who told the media that they didn&#039;t want the guy.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45779@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:34:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ms. Tek</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/133407.php#comment-45761</link>
<description>&lt;b&gt;ABB!  ABB!  ABB!&lt;/b&gt;

Why have an monarchy when you can have an empire of the world!

I nominate myself as The GRAND COMMANDER GENERAL AND EMPRESS OF THE UNIVERSE, TEK!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45761@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:30:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Hal Pawluk</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/133407.php#comment-45750</link>
<description>We already have that, Shark.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45750@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:05:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Shark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/133407.php#comment-45748</link>
<description>Just goes to show what months of relentless bashing by the media can do to someone.

Kinda sickening, really.

Screw the Dems and the Repubs; I&#039;m tending toward a Monarchy at this point.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45748@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:03:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Kent</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/133407.php#comment-45745</link>
<description>Yeah, he was kind of a walking zombie there after a while, refusing to smell the coffee. It&#039;s a shame all that money essentially went to waste.

I mean I liked his Joe Cocker impression and all, I just didn&#039;t want to see him as President after that.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45745@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:56:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Joe</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/133407.php#comment-45744</link>
<description>Yeah, but he loses points for blowing through $40M that could have gone to an electable candidate.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45744@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:51:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Hal Pawluk</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/133407.php#comment-45737</link>
<description>I think Dean deserves points for digging up more people for the Dems and getting a lot of free media on issues that should have surfaced much sooner, but I also think he should have dropped out sooner.

Without Dean in it, Edwards might have won in Wisconsin and we&#039;d have gotten a real race going.

As it stands, too many sheep are going to go with Kerry whether they&#039;re entirely on board with what he stands for or not.

That could change if the debate on the 26th is only between Kerry and Dean.  That&#039;s still up in the air, but I&#039;m hoping we get to see a real fight.

And no, I don&#039;t have a horse in this race - I&#039;m one of the ABB crowd.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45737@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:05:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by shaun</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/133407.php#comment-45732</link>
<description>and i had such high hopes for dean
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45732@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:52:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/133407.php#comment-45729</link>
<description>Thanks Hal, I believe he was done when he came UNdone - the rest was just death throes.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45729@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:45:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>