<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Eszterhas's Change of Life</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:19:09 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by HW Saxton Jr.</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/103152.php#comment-46624</link>
<description>I&#039;ve got to give the guy a two thumbs up
for &quot;Showgirls&quot;.It&#039;s the unintentionally
funniest movie I&#039;ve ever seen.It&#039;s been
developing quite a cult following as of
late,actually being shown at Midnight
Movies alongside classics such as &quot;Rock
N Roll High School,Mommie Dearest,Rocky
Horror,Plan 9 From Outer Space&quot;&amp; others.



   </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">46624@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:19:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Rodney Welch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/103152.php#comment-46605</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;Basic Instinct&lt;/i&gt; is hardly an immortal work of art, but it&#039;s an immortal work of something, and that&#039;s all due to Stone. She was so perfectly cast, and carries herself with such confidence, that she would be the only thing anyone remembered about that picture even if she had worn slacks all the way through it. Stone&#039;s performance was clearly fashioned on the kind of button-pushing bad-girl charisma of Madonna, and when the Material Girl&#039;s own sexy thriller came out later -- the quite forgettable &lt;i&gt;Body of Evidence&lt;/i&gt; -- Stone&#039;s achievement was even more notable: she had out-Madonna&#039;d Madonna, who was reduced to playing a mere parody of herself. 

I remember when I first saw Stone, in &lt;i&gt;Total Recall&lt;/i&gt;, and I knew immediately she&#039;d be a star. She has such basic movie-star good looks; she has &quot;the look,&#039; I guess you&#039;d say, that indefinable &quot;it&quot; quality that lifts    her from the realm of mere mortals, not unlike Julia Roberts or Cameron Diaz. She&#039;s the kind of actress that makes you yearn for the days of the studio system, when some hopefully benevolent corporate hand could have guided her from one great part to the next -- which is not, of course, what has happened, although she was very good in &lt;i&gt;Casino&lt;/i&gt;.


</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">46605@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:33:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/103152.php#comment-45981</link>
<description>Fix-ed</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45981@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:52:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Kent</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/103152.php#comment-45980</link>
<description>Damn italics - I&#039;ll get this thing eventually....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45980@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:49:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Kent</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/103152.php#comment-45978</link>
<description>Well, the entire film &lt;i&gt;Basic Instinct&lt;/i&gt; was figuratively focused on Sharon Stone&#039;s pussy, so I see no reason why the critics should not have honed in on the scene when it is most emphasized.....

&lt;i&gt;The Music Box&lt;/i&gt; had a great performance by Jessica Lange, but it is just a thinly-veiled rehash of Eszterhas&#039;s earlier film &lt;i&gt;The Jagged Edge&lt;/i&gt;, complete with shocking ending exposing one of the main protagonists as the initially suspected villain.....


I&#039;m not sure there&#039;s a single film in all of Eszterhas&#039;s repertoire that could even remotely be termed classic.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45978@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:46:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Rodney Welch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/103152.php#comment-45928</link>
<description>I guess it depends on the make-up of this &quot;screenwriter community.&quot; The ones who think purely in terms of money will surely value Eszterhas; the ones who hope to make a film that will be seen and studied for generations to come will prefer &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071315/&quot;&gt;Robert Towne.&lt;/a&gt;

Having said that, give credit where it&#039;s due: &lt;i&gt;Music Box&lt;/i&gt;, scripted by Eszterhas, is a first-class drama, and &lt;i&gt;Basic Instinct&lt;/i&gt; at least had a career-making performance by Sharon Stone, who should have been nominated for an Oscar, and maybe would have been had not the popular and critical attention been so exclusively focused on her pussy.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45928@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:46:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Shark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/103152.php#comment-45746</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;Joe Eszterhas is a hero in the screenwriter&#039;s community.&lt;/i&gt;

I almost spewed coffee all over my IMAC on that one. No offense, but somebody HAS to be joking.

This guy has churned out more hi-octane shit than an elephant on X-Lax. If he is a hero, it&#039;s because for a few years there, he could hire a roomful of monkeys to type out a script and the studios would dump a few million on another TURKEY no one bothered to read &#039;cause it had Joe&#039;s name on it.

Gee, it only took &#039;em, what, half a dozen tries to realize the bird-bath had run dry?

After &lt;i&gt;Showgirls&lt;/i&gt;, I&#039;m surprised God didn&#039;t say, &quot;Screw cancer, he&#039;s takin&#039; a lightning-bolt on his typing fingers!&quot;

He should consider himself lucky.

PS: Jennifer Beals!? You mean they have blind construction workers? Cool.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45746@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:57:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Kent</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/103152.php#comment-45736</link>
<description>Well, Don Simpson made his share of crappy movies. So it only follows that his lifestyle was as hedonistic as Eszterhas&#039;s.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45736@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:04:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/103152.php#comment-45734</link>
<description>Please let us know what you think of it after you check it out, Ricky, thanks!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45734@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:00:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ricky Vandal</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/18/103152.php#comment-45733</link>
<description>Joe Eszterhas is a hero in the screenwriter&#039;s community. I want to read his book. I hope it&#039;s just as revealing as the book about Don Simpson, the now dead coke snorting, hooker renting mega producer and erstwhile Jerry Bruckheimer partner. For some reason I get the idea this book will be better than any movie out there at the moment.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45733@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:56:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>