<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on More pieces of Feynman</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:59:41 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Richard Lubbock</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/13/072459.php#comment-46673</link>
<description>Feynman went to the same High School I attended -- Far Rockaway -- about two, three years ahead of me, and I had the same physics teacher he had. Name was Bader, a very understanding guy even when I screwed things up. Perhaps some of his influence rubbed off on me. Feynman&#039;s sister Joan was in the same class as me. She also became a physicist but I&#039;ve no idea where she is now.

What&#039;s this got to do with me or nanotechnology? Just about nothing. I get most of my science genes from my father, who was a &quot;rocket scientist&quot; in the 1940s. They called them plain engineers then. But perhaps I got my lifelong interest in far-out engineering from my dad. I went on to write comedy scripts and a blog.
 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">46673@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:59:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by sydney smith</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/13/072459.php#comment-44574</link>
<description>I didn&#039;t go to Cal Tech, and I&#039;m not a physicist, but my husband did his graduate work in physics at Cornell, where Feynman also once taught. He never had any close contact with him, but he attended some of Feynman&#039;s lectures which he says were the best physics lectures he&#039;s ever heard. They always provided a fresh angle and new way of thinking about things. The problem was that you had to already have a good grasp of the subject to get anything from Feynman&#039;s lectures. The consensus among students who were new to physics (i.e. &quot;physics-for-poets&quot; students) was that it was hard to learn anything from him for the first time. Which backs up Feynman&#039;s own observation about his teaching.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">44574@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2004 15:48:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Anita Campbell</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/13/072459.php#comment-44208</link>
<description>Thanks for introducing us to Feynman (those of us who were not acquainted with him or his work).   Fascinating stuff.  I will have to read up on him and his work.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">44208@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:23:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>