VeriSign Reconsiders Site Finder

Written by Ken Edwards
Published February 10, 2004

A company that plays a key role in managing the Internet's domain system is considering whether to restart a controversial search service that makes money off Web users' typos, a move that threatens to reignite a debate over who controls key segments of the Internet.

Stratton Sclavos, chief executive of VeriSign Inc., told investors in a conference call last month that the company might relaunch its "Site Finder" service as early as April.

Source: Washington Post

SiteFinder can go to hell as far as I am concerned. If I type a URL wrong I like to be able to correct the one or so letters I mistyped, not have to retype the entire thing, as well as be forced to see advertising. Not to mention it is bad for web developers.

The public backlash (again) will (again) kill SiteFinder (again).

If VeriSign considers this again, I hope ICANN tells them to shove it, and while they are at it, ICANN needs to get a back bone and really take it to VeriSign. Verisign needs to be stopped, and ICANN is in a place to do it, if they only would stand up.

From Slashdot: Can we outsource VeriSign to India? Very clever.

Ken Edwards is the Gaming Editor at Blogcritics, and calls Breaking Windows home. Ken works part time for Student Publications at BGSU as the Webmaster and System Administrator. He is also a freelance web developer.

Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
VeriSign Reconsiders Site Finder
Published: February 10, 2004
Type:
Section: Sci/Tech
Filed Under: Sci/Tech: Internet
Writer: Ken Edwards
Ken Edwards's BC Writer page
Ken Edwards's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Ken Edwards
Sci/Tech: Internet
All Sci/Tech Articles
Ken Edwards's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — February 10, 2004 @ 11:07AM — TDavid [URL]

I think we have now moved all domains from them. It feels good to be gone.

#2 — February 10, 2004 @ 12:02PM — jadester [URL]

the irony is that, in my experience, the vast majority of sites that have already made use of domain mis-spellings are, well, not worth the bother. I.e., i seriously doubt they're making their owners much more than the domain registration and hosting costs. Except possibly the porn ones (i haven't had the luck to stumble on one of these yet but i have heard of some =+)

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/12579)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments