<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Super Bowl XXXVIII; Commercials</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:44:06 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Big Tom</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/02/051953.php#comment-310536</link>
<description>the hoars fart thing was funny. i don&#039;t care who you are or what you do. that is pure entertainment. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">310536@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:44:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Big Tom</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/02/051953.php#comment-310533</link>
<description>I think that their should be a website where you can watch ausome commercials and vidio clips and music videos but have something educational so it cannot be listed as a banned site at school. i don&#039;t work i need entertainment. and i saw janet jaksons boob it was not offensive it dosn&#039;t even look that good come on people.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">310533@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:40:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Janet Love</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/02/051953.php#comment-41422</link>
<description>I thought that the referree being berated by his wife was FAR more offensive than the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usenetbinaries.com/groups/alt.binaries.multimedia.erotica/2004/02/02/h/Janet%20Jackson%20-%20Superbowl.avi.html&quot;&gt;Janet Jackson boob flash&lt;/a&gt;.  What does that say about relationships; &quot;Have another beer&quot;?

-12
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">41422@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Feb 2004 23:31:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Don Stevens</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/02/051953.php#comment-41357</link>
<description>It appears that I am the only one objecting to the &quot;Budweiser Horse Fart Explosion&quot; commercial.  To me this one was very out of place-even more so than Janet&#039;s epose&#039;.
Are there others who object to the setting afire of a horses massive expulsion of methane gas on a TV commercial viewed by millions? </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">41357@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Feb 2004 19:58:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ken Edwards</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/02/051953.php#comment-41329</link>
<description>Possibility.  But I am not so sure.  With the iTunes and iPod commercials that have been out for a while, even people I know that are not computer people know it all works on the PC as well now.

Coke?  AAAHHHHHH!  We have had this discussion on this site before, PEPSI RULES!!!  HE HE :P</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">41329@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Feb 2004 18:49:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gina</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/02/051953.php#comment-41157</link>
<description>Just wanted to add that the lack of an Apple Logo was most likely done on purpose.  Most likely, they didn&#039;t wan&#039;t the viewing audience to say, &quot;Oh, that&#039;s a Mac thing&quot; seeing as how iTunes can work on a PC too.
I think it is a great campaign, I just wish they had hooked up with Coke instead of Poopsi.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">41157@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:34:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>