Pixar Splits With Disney

Written by Eric Olsen
Published January 30, 2004

Talks have ended between Pixar and Disney regarding their distribution deal:

    Pixar Animation Studios Inc. said Thursday it ended talks with Walt Disney Co. to extend a five-picture deal for Disney to distribute Pixar films.

    Pixar, the computer animation pioneer founded by Apple Computer Inc.'s Steve Jobs, said it would begin talks with other companies to distribute its films starting in 2006.

    "After ten months of trying to strike a deal with Disney, we're moving on," Pixar CEO Steve Jobs said in a statement. "We've had a great run together — one of the most successful in Hollywood history — and it's a shame that Disney won't be participating in Pixar's future successes."

    The move was a clear setback to Disney, which reaped a financial and critical bonanza from the partnership and has struggled with its own strategy for animation.

    Disney said Pixar's final offer would have cost Disney hundreds of millions of dollars from the existing distribution deal and was not sweet enough going forward.

    ....Pixar said its five films so far — including "Toy Story", "Monsters Inc." and "Finding Nemo" — have taken in $2.5 billion at the worldwide box office and sold more than 150 million DVDs and videos. "Finding Nemo" was the highest grossing animated film of all time.

    Pixar had complained that the terms of the distribution deal were tilted too heavily in Disney's favor. Under the deal, Pixar was responsible for content, while Disney handled distribution and marketing.

    In exchange, Pixar has split profits with Disney and pays the studio a distribution fee of between 10 percent to 15 percent of revenue. Based on its blockbuster success, Pixar has argued that it should keep the profit itself and cut the fees its studio partner charges.

    ...."It makes it look like Eisner did something wrong again, but we shouldn't jump to conclusions. This could be a negotiating tactic by Pixar as well," Patrick McKeigue, an analyst at Independence Investment, which holds Disney shares, told Reuters.

    Roy Disney and ally Stanley Gold, who both resigned from the Disney board late last year and called for Eisner to step down, placed the blame squarely on the Disney CEO.

    "More than a year ago, we warned the Disney board that we believed Michael Eisner was mismanaging the Pixar partnership and expressed our concern that the relationship was in jeopardy," they said in a statement issued late Thursday.

    Disney noted in its statement that it owns rights to all the Pixar movies, as well as two more animated features yet to be delivered — "The Incredibles" due this year and "Cars", expected in 2005. [CNN/Money]

More ammo for the anti-Eisners. Disney seems to be painting itself into a corner, having reduced its own animation staff. Or it could all just be tactics.

Either way, Pixar has the content and knows it - they hold the cards.

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Pixar Splits With Disney
Published: January 30, 2004
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Animation, Video: News
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
Video: Animation
Video: News
All Video Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — January 30, 2004 @ 11:00AM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

The other thing Pixar has which Disney doesn't is the technology to produce that content. Pixar originally started as a software company, and is one of the leading developers in 3-D animation software, render-farms and cluster computing.

Disney used to be an innovator in technology via the Imagineers, but almost all of that has been scrapped over the years under Eisner.

#2 — January 30, 2004 @ 19:02PM — Dwaine AKA Scooter AKA D.J.

That's sad. But, thats life.

#3 — January 26, 2006 @ 12:51PM — Katfish

Item: Disney acquires Pixar for $7.4 Billion.

This is the beginning of the end for Pixar, and don't believe it when they say that the companies will remain separate, either. Disney's influence will be felt, and that is a bad thing.

Ever since Roy Disney left the company in acrimony, Pixar had vaulted to the front in the animation arena, while Disney has descended into mediocrity with it's numerous (and inferior) sequels to their successful animated movies (as well as the swill they crank out on their cable channel). Even Chicken Little bombed - which is why the corporate suits wanted to acquire Pixar.

You could see the writing on the wall. Last week, John Lasseter was on TCM, touting the movies of his friend, Hayao Miyazaki; and if anyone has seen The Incredibles DVD, then they know that things at Pixar were starting to get stale, and needed to bring in someone like Brad Bird to shake things up. He succeeded, too - making that movie the best that has ever come out of that studio.

Meanwhile, the Disney Corporation has contented itself with cranking out family fare on its channel, lowering the bar on what is the most bland programming ever seen. I'm sure there are people (mostly parents) who would disagree - of course, they think that McDonalds is a good place to eat, too.

So I'd like to say, "so long" to Pixar. It was a great run, and you were in the forefront of CGI animation from its infancy. You contributed to its evolution more so than any other studio - but soon you'll be on the same level as Dreamworks. It no longer matters, all good things must come to an end. Pixar has outgrown its humble roots, and is now just another big corporation.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/12180)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments