Cigars are yummy mouth candy

Written by Tom Bux
Published January 29, 2004
page 1 | 2

The bill, known as the Internet Tobacco Sales Enforcement Act, or HR 2824, went to the House Judiciary Committee after the passage of the Senate's Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking (PACT) Act, or S. 1177 in December. Championed by Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) in June, the PACT Act was introduced to prevent cigarette smuggling and ensure the proper collection of cigarette taxes. The bill was changed in its final stages when it was expanded to include all tobacco products — including cigars — and would prohibit the shipment of all tobacco products through the U.S. mail. With the passage of S. 1177, a similar bill was brought forward to the House Judiciary Committee — HR 2824.

Why is it so hard for governments to allow a privately owned restaurants to cater to the clientelle they wish to? Why can't a restaurant which wants to be smoke free while a bar or restaurant which wants to cater to smokers continue to do so? And for people who may want to try various different smokes not available at their local smoke shop, why shouldn't they be able to buy cigars from the internet and through mail-order?

Smoking isn't that bad, it shouldn't be a crime. It is merely something enjoyes much like drinking alcohol, or enjoying a good meal.

I like what Winston Churchill, a famous cigar smoker, said about smoking when told he was not allowed to smoke at a state event:

"I must point out that my rule of life prescribed as an absolutely sacred rite smoking cigars and also the drinking of alcohol before, after, and if need be during all meals and in the intervals between them".

Is that too much to ask?

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Cigars are yummy mouth candy
Published: January 29, 2004
Type:
Section: Tastes
Writer: Tom Bux
Tom Bux's BC Writer page
Tom Bux's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Tom Bux
All Tastes Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — January 29, 2004 @ 16:21PM — JR

Is that too much to ask?

Dude, you have no idea. This oughta be good.

#2 — January 29, 2004 @ 18:48PM — Tom Johnson [URL]

Let's save everyone the trouble and just link back to the giant debate, shall we? Here 'tis.

Besides health concerns and the rights of the majority who want to breath smoke free air, cigars smell like someone lit a skunk on fire.

There, that oughtta get some reactions.

#3 — January 29, 2004 @ 18:52PM — Tom [URL]

The right of the majority? These same majorities wanted prohabition and look what that got us.

What about the free market? A restaurant or bar owner should decide for himself if his establishment will allow smoking or not.

There is a local steakhouse that is smoke free. That is great. I'm glad. I don't want to eat around smoke.

But if I and others want to smoke I should be able to choose a place that allows smoking.

#4 — January 29, 2004 @ 18:56PM — Eric Olsen

I actually don't mind the smell of a good cigar in a ventillated environment, but my sinuses don't know that and shut down with the finality of a chastity belt.

I DO see a difference on many levels between cigars and cigarettes, but I will have to think about the policy distinctions.

#5 — January 29, 2004 @ 21:16PM — Mac Diva [URL]

I am from North Carolina, a state that subsisted on tobacco and textiles for much of its history. My maternal grandfather and uncles owned tobacco farms. (After seeing her first big, fat tobacco worm, the Lil' Diva ceased all visitations to tobacco fields.) Many older family members smoked, dipped, snuffed or chewed. But, despite having tobacco in my system, so to speak, I cannot, in any way, condone smoking.

The medical research does not distinguish among different tobacco products much. All cause cancer, though, where the cancer occurs can be determined by choice of vice. For example, snuffers and chewers are more likely to get cancer of the mouth or nose. For me, just one look at a picture of a guy missing his nose because he was a snuff user or a woman breathing through a hole in her throat because she smoked, would be reason enough to quit. I guess that just proves I'm not a tobacco addict.

#6 — January 29, 2004 @ 21:50PM — Tom [URL]

I like what Steve Allen said:

"Asthma doesn't seem to bother me any more unless I'm around cigars or dogs. The thing that would bother me most would be a dog smoking a cigar".

#7 — January 30, 2004 @ 22:42PM — Eric Olsen

Isn't candy the real mouth candy?

#8 — January 30, 2004 @ 22:55PM — Ms. Tek [URL]

I think people should be allowed to smoke pot if they want to.

Personally, I hate the stuff, but I think if people want to toke a joint, more power to them. I perfer stoned people to drunk people.

Smoking isn't that bad, it shouldn't be a crime.

#9 — May 1, 2006 @ 18:46PM — mark

"Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" is one of the most famous phrases in the United States Declaration of Independence. It is listed as one of the "unalienable rights" of man-
Therefore, cigar bars should not be denied to operate. Enjoying an occassional cigar should not be a crime.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/12152)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments