Musical Resonance

Written by Mark Saleski
Published January 23, 2004
page 1 | 2 | 3

Now we're into the 'verses'. While Peart plays a supporting ride pattern, Alex plays the 'theme' of the song. Geddy Lee's bass, instead of merely holding up the bottom end, mirrors the guitar theme...in a mutant sort of way.

A few extended guitar chords serve as an introduction to the next section...where the skeletal drums and periodic bass notes (Taurus Pedals?) provide plenty of room for an extended guitar solo that builds and builds and builds...

...Until it stops to begin a muted staccato pattern that again builds to...

A 'tumbling' section that both frenzied and controlled. It's like a rock band falling down the stairs. Gracefully.

Some call & response, some start and stop...and then we begin a highly modified restatement of the original 'verses', which morphs into some wild and crazy bass/drum unison bits.

A few more nearly indescribable rhythmic chord workouts and we're again back to the final theme revisit before the song's finale is encountered - where again descending shards of chords build monumental amounts of energy. This 'exercise in self-indulgence' ends in a flurry of unison bass and snare drum notes followed by one last clipped guitar chord.

What I love about this music (besides the 'visual' aspect, that I can't begin to describe) is the sense of shared adventure. Sure, all bands play together. But not all bands have togetherness. Rush puts together musics that overflows with enthusiasm for rock's possibilities. Yes, the players are supposed to be 'virtuosos'. Who cares?! What matters is results: how those air molecules are wiggled.

Other candidates for adventures with Rush (though I don't want to turn this into a "what's your favorite" kinda thing) are "Free Will" from Permanent Waves, "YYZ" from the breakthrough record Moving Pictures and the introduction to the epic 2112. Lots and lots of textured surfaces to be explored.

Well, there. How I perceive music (sort of), some Rush epiphanies, and an extension to everybody's vocabulary: whatness.

(Special thanks to fellow Blogcritic and Rush fan Tom Johnson and uber-Blogcritic (and future Rush fan) Eric Olsen for starting the e-conversion that pushed me toward this essay).

(First posted on Mark Is Cranky)

page 1 | 2 | 3
Mark Saleski is a writer and music obsessive based out of the Monadnock region of New Hampshire. On his best day, he hopes to channel the ghosts of Lester Bangs and Jack Kerouac. He spends the hours of 9:32PM to 1:37AM carving out music reviews and essays for Jazz.com, Blogcritics.org and other publications.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Musical Resonance
Published: January 23, 2004
Type:
Section: Music
Writer: Mark Saleski
Mark Saleski's BC Writer page
Mark Saleski's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Mark Saleski
All Music Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — January 23, 2004 @ 10:28AM — Casper [URL]

Well, I guess I'll start the "my-favorite-Rush-song" thread by say that La Villa Strangiato is probably my favorite one. A bit over nine minutes long, it wanders through a bunch of different musical idioms (Flamenco, Waltz, Prog-Rock, and those are just the ones that I can think of off the top of my head).

The live verson on Exit Stage Left is even better (the jury's still out on the Live in Rio version).

#2 — January 23, 2004 @ 10:50AM — Craig Lyndall [URL]

My favorite Rush song is the one they will record after I get my hands around the throat of Geddy Lee for singing like a 6 year old boy who got knocked in the balls.

#3 — January 23, 2004 @ 12:04PM — Eric Olsen

Man, I love "Working Man" because it sounds like Black Sabbath after detox - IT ROCKS.

Mark, many thanks for a brilliant and readable explanation of the unexplainable. It's the effort that makes it so endearing and meaningful. And yes, my interest is piqued. Great job!

#4 — January 23, 2004 @ 12:14PM — Mark Saleski [URL]

thanks E.

Sabbath after detox...hmmmm.

#5 — January 23, 2004 @ 21:12PM — Tom Johnson [URL]

Nice work, Mark. I'm still mulling my response over. I think I may have to write a book to explain it all . . .

#6 — January 23, 2004 @ 23:45PM — Mark Saleski [URL]

thanks tom, don't mull too hard. you might pull something.

#7 — March 17, 2004 @ 12:42PM — JohnnyLunchBox

My favorite Rush songs are the ones they haven't written yet. I think I just hurt my brain.

#8 — November 16, 2007 @ 12:42PM — Tom Johnson [URL]

Man, I'm glad you linked to this from here. I didn't remember this at all, but I'm glad to have a refresher. (Unfortunately, I also don't remember the conversation you note that spawned it - I'm kinda curious now!)

I certainly get what you're saying. Texture is something I've come to realize is very important to me. If it doesn't "feel" right, it just doesn't work, and it likely never will. Not only that, I often have this visual in my head of a live line-graph to the music, or maybe the raw wave-form of the music as seen in a sound editing program. Up and down it goes as various events happen. No one else seems to understand what I'm talking about.

Jeez, that sounds nuts, reading back on it.

#9 — November 16, 2007 @ 12:52PM — Mark Saleski [URL]

makes sense to me!

#10 — November 16, 2007 @ 16:43PM — Josh [URL]

Dynamics come in to play as well; that Dylan quote about modern recordings being atrocious and all. Soft and loud, harsh and rounded... that makes a difference when I listen. Dylan's Modern Times and Wilco's Sky Blue Sky take advantage of textures and dynamics better than a lot of records I've listened to recently.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/11967)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments