<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Musical Resonance</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:43:31 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Josh on Musical Resonance</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/23/095028.php#comment-655513</link>
<description>Dynamics come in to play as well; that Dylan quote about modern recordings being atrocious and all.  Soft and loud, harsh and rounded... that makes a difference when I listen.  Dylan&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Modern Times&lt;/i&gt; and Wilco&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Sky Blue Sky&lt;/i&gt; take advantage of textures and dynamics better than a lot of records I&#039;ve listened to recently.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">655513@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:43:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski on Musical Resonance</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/23/095028.php#comment-655426</link>
<description>makes sense to me!
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">655426@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:52:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom Johnson on Musical Resonance</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/23/095028.php#comment-655421</link>
<description>Man, I&#039;m glad you linked to this from &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/11/16/110737.php&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  I didn&#039;t remember this at all, but I&#039;m glad to have a refresher. (Unfortunately, I also don&#039;t remember the conversation you note that spawned it - I&#039;m kinda curious now!)

I certainly get what you&#039;re saying.  Texture is something I&#039;ve come to realize is very important to me.  If it doesn&#039;t &quot;feel&quot; right, it just doesn&#039;t work, and it likely never will.  Not only that, I often have this visual in my head of a live line-graph to the music, or maybe the raw wave-form of the music as seen in a sound editing program.  Up and down it goes as various events happen.  No one else seems to understand what I&#039;m talking about.

Jeez, that sounds nuts, reading back on it.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">655421@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:42:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>