<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Flock of Seagulls Reunite</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 4 Apr 2006 17:57:26 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by jammin jimi</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/22/121151.php#comment-346012</link>
<description>come on guys, a flock of seagulls deserves better treatment than what i am reading.  if you listen to ANY band that is still around from the 80&#039;s, none of them sound as they originally did, not in voice or in upbeat tempo.  a flock of seagulls kicks major butt, just listen to their greatest hits cd, every song is the BEST.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">346012@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Apr 2006 17:57:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ted</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/22/121151.php#comment-40854</link>
<description>Space Age Love Song is one of the best songs of all time. But his voice has not aged well. It did sound anemic.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">40854@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Feb 2004 14:27:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/22/121151.php#comment-39952</link>
<description>The first two Flock of Hairdoos were great - they still really hold up well, although the production is a bit, uh, wet. But I believe you about the voice. I saw some later version at a little club in LA after their prime and it was perfunctory at best.

I remember them rocking at the US Festival in the early-&#039;80s and they were good, but they used a LOT of treatments and whatnot - their sound was always studio-based.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">39952@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:43:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Casper</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/22/121151.php#comment-39949</link>
<description>Sorry, Dan, I did grow up in the 80s.  I still like Kajagoogoo&#039;s Too Shy (it&#039;s a kickin&#039; bass line), but the guys from Flock have not aged well.  The singer&#039;s voice was completely ragged out, he sang flat and seemed to be out of breath more often than not.  I stand by my opinion.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">39949@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:26:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by dan meyer</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/22/121151.php#comment-39945</link>
<description>i just want to say that the flock reunion was awsome and i hope they would tour. If your not from the 80s you wouldnt understand!! </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">39945@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:15:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Wilson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/22/121151.php#comment-38669</link>
<description>I can&#039;t believe it was 1982 when I saw those guys. They were the warm-up act for Squeeze, their album had just been released (before &quot;I Ran&quot; and &quot;Space Age Love Song&quot; had hit the airwaves), and we thought they were the best thing since, well, The Cars. They were certainly better live than Squeeze. Of course, I was young at the time, but it was still a great show......</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38669@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:44:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>