<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Who's Got the Looks?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:52:41 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Joe</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/20/122920.php#comment-38325</link>
<description>It strikes me as a bit odd that an anonymous Scottish drag queen would take umbrage at another&#039;s moniker.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38325@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:52:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/20/122920.php#comment-38318</link>
<description>Mr. Potato Head was the ugliest toy I ever received as a child.  I&#039;m still traumatized by it-:).

A woman ripping off the name &#039;Methos&#039; from &lt;i&gt;Highlander&lt;/i&gt;?  That&#039;s even worse.  At lease she could have chosen &#039;Amanda&#039;.   Nah. I like Amanda.  Methos, too, beaky nose and all,  until the name was ruined at Blogcritics.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38318@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:31:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by HW Saxton Jr</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/20/122920.php#comment-38316</link>
<description>That is really,really,really low Mac D.
What&#039;ve you got against Mr.Potato Head?
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38316@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:25:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ZMethos</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/20/122920.php#comment-38289</link>
<description>See, you&#039;re turning this into a personal attack on me and there&#039;s no call for that.

First of all, I&#039;m a &quot;her&quot; not a &quot;him.&quot; You just can&#039;t keep jumping to conclusions about me.

Second of all, I don&#039;t have a political bias. Once again, I state for the record: I was watching the caucuses and simply had some observations on the apperance of some of the candidates. There weren&#039;t any Republican candidates present for me to look at at the time. Maybe I&#039;ll talk about them some other time. ~ZM</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38289@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 20:15:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/20/122920.php#comment-38284</link>
<description>I would be down with Methos (despite his fear of uppity colored folks and women taking over textbooks and thereby corrupting American youth) if he were being bi-partisan about the looks issue.   But, to be fair in this thing, one must admit Shrub resembles a chimp.  And Cheney?  Newfound popularity for Mr. Potato Head.  I believe Methos&#039; political bias will prevent him from doing the same to Republicans. 

And, let me add that I resent (yes, resent!) people who steal the names of sci-fi characters to use as their screen names.  It is so-o-o-o unoriginal.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38284@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 19:52:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by duane</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/20/122920.php#comment-38272</link>
<description>Haha! &quot;Mud suckingly.&quot; Good one. I think it&#039;s more likely that people are resigning themselves to the sad fact that looks matter (see bhw&#039;s post), even in a presidential campaign. This has been pretty much accepted since Kennedy vs. Nixon. I&#039;d rather give the benefit of the doubt to the posters here and ZMethos, and presume that they don&#039;t use appearance as a criterion when voting, but that they find it entertaining to make fun of the hopefuls anyway. Whether or not Bush looks presidential and has done a great job are two separate issues. Who cares what he looks like? Ah, nevermind...I think I just answered my own question. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38272@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 19:11:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ZMethos</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/20/122920.php#comment-38271</link>
<description>I&#039;m not a Right Winger, and I&#039;m not attacking anybody. It&#039;s just an observation. And you have nothing to base such a suspicion on. ~ZM</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38271@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 19:11:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/20/122920.php#comment-38269</link>
<description>Have Right Winger&#039;s no qualms?  Sinking to an attack on the Democratic candidates&#039; appearance is rather mud suckingly low.  And, why do I have a suspicion that Methos believes George W. Bush looks presidential and has done a great job?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38269@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:49:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by duane</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/20/122920.php#comment-38264</link>
<description>Here we are folks
The dream we all dream of
Dem versus Dem in the World Series of Putdowns
Tell me, have you got the look? 

You walked in, I woke up
I never seen a contender
Look so nuts, baby
You got that look
Color you lame and wack
Color me taken aback
Crucial, I don&#039;t think I wantcha</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38264@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:33:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/20/122920.php#comment-38240</link>
<description>Kerry looks like Muskie, he is doomed.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38240@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:00:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mike</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/20/122920.php#comment-38226</link>
<description>Gore Vidal: &quot;John Kerry looks like Lincoln [pause]....after the assasination.&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38226@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:18:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bhw</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/20/122920.php#comment-37554</link>
<description>I wrote a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/19/085010.php&quot;&gt;post yesterday&lt;/a&gt; about the first lady&#039;s looks. Sad, but true that we [collectively speaking] judge people so much by their physical appearance. What would have happened to ol&#039; Honest Abe if the country had been as shallow back then?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">37554@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:57:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JR</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/20/122920.php#comment-37540</link>
<description>Ben Stein called John Edwards &quot;the Breck girl&quot;.

I see a resemblence between George Bush Jr. and Chevy Chase.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">37540@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:58:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>