<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on ROTK Leading Oscars Sweepstakes</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 12:54:32 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Wilson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/18/134240.php#comment-38382</link>
<description>I would be surprised if &quot;Return of the King&quot; wins, but it would be an award for the entire trilogy, a nod for a job well done. I see Peter Jackson definitely winning the Best Director award, but perhaps a more &quot;dignified&quot; film winning Best Picture. Sort of like the &quot;Shakespeare In Love,&quot; &quot;Saving Private Ryan&quot; year......</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38382@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 12:54:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by John Lars Ericson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/18/134240.php#comment-37271</link>
<description>Yeah - it&#039;ll sweep. Not nearly one of the five best pictures of the year, but hey.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">37271@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2004 17:28:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jonathan</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/18/134240.php#comment-37266</link>
<description>if it doesn&#039;t win a bunch, the nerds will riot. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">37266@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2004 17:01:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>