REVIEW

Music Review: Phantom Planet - Phantom Planet

Written by Jeff Petermann
Published January 13, 2004

The latest offering from rock and rollers Phantom Planet is a fresh and inspiring departure from their previous effort. While the songs on the self-titled album, which hit the stores on Jan.6 of this year, are a bit less rock influenced than songs from their previous work (including a great cover of the wildly catchy "California"), the latest offering has something going for it that their previous work did not--originality. 80s-esque beats are speckled throughout the album and mesh nicely with lead singer Alexander Greenwald's vocals.

This latest effort, while obviously influenced by the Velvet Underground, or as AP Mag put it, "a carbon copy of the Velvet Underground", has a charge of passion, which I just don't feel when I listen to the Strokes, the Velvet Underground, or even Elephant from the White Stripes.

Phantom Planet made me feel emotions with this album that I have not had conjured up by a rock band since last year's Saddle Creek Records artist Sorry About Dresden masterpiece. This album is wonderful and cheap which is a great combination that the musical world could use more of.

Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Buy from Amazon.com
Phantom Planet Is Missing Phantom Planet Is Missing
Phantom Planet
Music,
Phantom Planet Phantom Planet
Phantom Planet
Music,

Music Review: Phantom Planet - Phantom Planet
Published: January 13, 2004
Type: Review
Section: Music
Filed Under: Music: Indie Rock, Music: Pop
Writer: Jeff Petermann
Jeff Petermann's BC Writer page
Jeff Petermann's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Jeff Petermann
Music: Indie Rock
Music: Pop
All Music Articles
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — January 13, 2004 @ 15:22PM — Tom Johnson [URL]

I love these guys, and reading your review makes me happy just knowing there are actually other males who are into them. Apparently they really appeal to a primarily female crowd, but I can't figure out why - they're really pretty hard sounding, which typically doesn't appeal to the "screaming teen girl" crowd. Either way, if you think you know what this band is about because of overexposure to "California," think again.

Oh, and be sure to pick up their live bootleg at Phantom Planet Bootlegs. It has more songs that the commercially released DVD of the same performance - and no "California," for those that are sick of it.

Just a note - "California" is not a cover, it's their own song.

#2 — January 13, 2004 @ 15:25PM — Jeff Petermann

Really? I thought California was a cover song from a 60's band--I kept drawing a blank on the name of the band...I guess that is why=)

I def. like their latest release better than the guest...my wife likes the guest better though so, go figure.

#3 — January 13, 2004 @ 15:33PM — Tom Johnson [URL]

I agree - this one is stronger. I saw them opening for Elvis Costello last year and thought they were much harder live than on the Guest. This new album captures that sound much better. The Guest is a little uneven in places, showing a lot of separate influences but it doesn't gel quite like this one does. I have a feeling that Jason Schwartzman, he of "Rushmore" fame, may have had something to do with the strongly pop-influenced sound they had. Now that he's left the band, they seem to be much harder edged. I haven't heard the first album Is Missing (can't find it locally.) Recommended?

#4 — January 13, 2004 @ 15:41PM — Jeff PEtermann

Not sure--I hear that it is much like the guest--a littler more raw--it is on Amazon for $11ish

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/11680)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments